Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Union of India vs Dr Sanjay

The Union of India vs Dr Sanjay

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Dec 20, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1847683

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CCC/100387/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Union of India

Respondent

Dr Sanjay

Excerpt

.....and dist. haveri-581110. digitally signed by manjanna …complainant e (by sri. avinash m. angadi, advocate) location: high court of karnataka, dharwad bench and: dr. sanjay s/o. rajashekhar magavi, age. about 59 years, residing at: 3163a, railway station road, tq & dist. haveri-581110. …accused this ccc is filed u/s. 11 & 12 of the contempt of courts act, 1971, r/w. article 215 of constitution of india, 1950, praying to take contempt action against the accused for willful and deliberate disobedience of theorder dated. 24.09.2024 passed by this hon’ble court in wpno. 105325/2024 in accordance with law and etc. -2-this petition, coming on for orders, this day, orderwas passed therein as under: coram: the hon'ble mr. justice h.t.narendra prasad andoral order(per: the hon'ble mr. justice h.t.narendra prasad) the complainant submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner/respondent has put-up construction in sy.no.2e/3 measuring 23 guntas situated at sidedevapur village of haveri taluk. in the order dated 24.09.2024 passed in wpno.105325/2024, there is no any direction or interim orderrestraining the respondent/petitioner to put-up any construction in the aforesaid property. on the other hand, there is a direction to the complainant/respondent not to continue with any work in respect of the above said property. there is no violation of the order passed by this court dated 24.09.2024 in wp no.105325/2024. hence, contempt petition is dismissed. (h.t.narendra prasad) (venkatesh naik t) jtr/ct-an list no.: 1 sl no.: 9

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD AND CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100387 OF 2024 BETWEEN:

1. THE UNION OF INDIA, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, S.W.R. SOUDHA, GADAG ROAD, HUBBALLI-DHARWAD-580020.

2. THE DIVISIONAL, RAILWAY MANAGER,

REPRESENTED BY SENIOR RAILWAY ENGINEER, SHRI. ROHAN DONGRE, DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER OFFICE, MYSORE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, IRVIN ROAD, MEDAR BLOCK, YADAVAGIRI, TQ & DIST. MYSURU-570021.

3. THE MANAGER,

HAVERI RAILWAY STATION, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, STATION ROAD, TQ AND DIST. HAVERI-581110. Digitally signed by MANJANNA …COMPLAINANT E (BY SRI. AVINASH M. ANGADI, ADVOCATE) Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench AND: DR. SANJAY S/O. RAJASHEKHAR MAGAVI, AGE. ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT: 3163A, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, TQ & DIST. HAVERI-581110. …ACCUSED THIS CCC IS FILED U/S. 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO TAKE CONTEMPT ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFUL AND DELIBERATE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE

ORDER DATED. 24.09.2024 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WP

NO. 105325/2024 IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC. -2-

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS PASSED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD AND

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD) The complainant submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner/respondent has put-up construction in Sy.No.2E/3 measuring 23 guntas situated at Sidedevapur village of Haveri Taluk. In the order dated 24.09.2024 passed in WP

No.105325/2024, there is no any direction or interim order

restraining the respondent/petitioner to put-up any construction in the aforesaid property. On the other hand, there is a direction to the complainant/respondent not to continue with any work in respect of the above said property. There is no violation of the order passed by this Court dated 24.09.2024 in WP No.105325/2024. Hence, contempt petition is dismissed. (H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD) (VENKATESH NAIK T) JTR/ct-an List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial