Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ranjith R. vs State of Kerala

Ranjith R. vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 22, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1847587

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./329/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ranjith R.

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice raja vijayaraghavan v tuesday ,the 22nd day of january 2019 / 2nd magha, 1940 bail appl..no. 329 of 2018 petitioners/accused: 1 ranjith r., s/o. raveendran, aged 32 years, 2 raveendran k., aged 57 years, ranjubhavanam, cheravally, kayamkulam p.o. 3 sulochana, aged 52 years, w/o. reveendran, by advs. sri.john k.george sri.dr.prabhu m.a. respondent/complainant: state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam. sri. t. r. renjith pp. this bail application having come up for admission on 22.01.2019, the court on the same day passed the following: bail appl..no. 329 of 2018 2orderwhen the matter was taken up, the learned public prosecutor, oninstructions, submitted that no crime has been registered against the applicants at the kayamkulam police station. the said submission is recorded. if the presence of the applicants is required in any crime registered at the kayamkulam police station on the basis of allegations narrated in this bail application, advance notice under section 41a of the code of criminal procedure shall be issued.this application is closed. sd/- raja vijayaraghavan v., judge iap

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V TUESDAY ,THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 2ND MAGHA, 1940 Bail Appl..No. 329 of 2018 PETITIONERS/ACCUSED: 1 RANJITH R., S/O. RAVEENDRAN, AGED 32 YEARS, 2 RAVEENDRAN K., AGED 57 YEARS, RANJUBHAVANAM, CHERAVALLY, KAYAMKULAM P.O. 3 SULOCHANA, AGED 52 YEARS, W/O. REVEENDRAN, BY ADVS. SRI.JOHN K.GEORGE SRI.DR.PRABHU M.A. RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. SRI. T. R. RENJITH PP. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Bail Appl..No. 329 of 2018 2

ORDER

When the matter was taken up, the learned Public Prosecutor, on

instructions, submitted that no Crime has been registered against the applicants at the Kayamkulam Police Station. The said submission is recorded. If the presence of the applicants is required in any crime registered at the Kayamkulam Police Station on the basis of allegations narrated in this Bail Application, advance notice under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall be issued.

This application is closed. Sd/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., JUDGE IAP

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial