Krishnan vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 15, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1846655

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1846655
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Sunil Thomas
Decided On: Jan 15, 2019
Case Number: Bail Appl./7/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnan

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam 682 031 2 station house officer, kothamangalam police station, ernakulam district 686 other present: sr.pp d chandrasenan this bail application having come up for admission on 15.01.2019, the court on the same day passed the following:o r d e rthe petitioner herein apprehending arrest in crime no.2697/2018 of kothamangalam police station for offences punishable under sections 324 and 308 ipc, seeks bail.2. the allegation of the prosecution is that the petitionerherein attacked the defacto complainant with a sharp long weapon on 19.12.2018 at 7.30 p.m to inflict injury on his neck. he moved to one side and it injured his shoulder. he was taken to the local hospital from where he was shifted to medical college hospital, kalamassery.3. the petitioner apprehending arrest in the crime that was registered, seeks bail.4. it seems that a sharp weapon has been used. wound certificate shows that the victim had sustained an injury of 7x2 c.m. though recovery has been effected, the antecedents of thepetitioner herein does not appear to be appreciable. he is involved in two different cases of kodanadu police station for offences punishable under sections 506(ii), 420, 447 294(b) r/w. section 5 and 27 (i) of the arms act. both the crimes are registered by the kodanadu police station. considering the antecedents of the petitioner herein and the nature of allegation and the injury inflicted on the defacto complainant, i do not feel that this is a fit case in which the benefit of pre-arrest bail can be granted to the petitioner herein. bail application fails and dismissed. sd/- sunil thomas shg judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS TUESDAY ,THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 25TH POUSHA, 1940 CRIME NO. 2697/2018 OF Kothamangalam Police Station , Ernakulam PETITIONER/ACCUSED: KRISHNAN AGED 36 YEARS S/O. JANARDHANAN, PANAMPILLY HOUSE, KOOVAPPADY, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM BY ADVS. SRI.S.RENJITH SRI.P.K.SREEVALSAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOTHAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 686 OTHER PRESENT: SR.PP D CHANDRASENAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

The petitioner herein apprehending arrest in crime no.2697/2018 of Kothamangalam police station for offences punishable under sections 324 and 308 IPC, seeks bail.

2. The allegation of the prosecution is that the petitioner

herein attacked the defacto complainant with a sharp long weapon on 19.12.2018 at 7.30 p.m to inflict injury on his neck. He moved to one side and it injured his shoulder. He was taken to the local hospital from where he was shifted to Medical College Hospital, Kalamassery.

3. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the crime that was registered, seeks bail.

4. It seems that a sharp weapon has been used. Wound certificate shows that the victim had sustained an injury of 7x2 c.m. Though recovery has been effected, the antecedents of the

petitioner herein does not appear to be appreciable. He is involved in two different cases of Kodanadu police station for offences punishable under Sections 506(ii), 420, 447 294(b) r/w. Section 5 and 27 (i) of the Arms Act. Both the crimes are registered by the Kodanadu police station. Considering the antecedents of the petitioner herein and the nature of allegation and the injury inflicted on the defacto complainant, I do not feel that this is a fit case in which the benefit of pre-arrest bail can be granted to the petitioner herein. Bail application fails and dismissed. Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS shg JUDGE

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2019 Same Parties Krishnan vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Sunil Thomas