Arjunan vs Lakshmi

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jul 22, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1845807

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1845807
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice P.B. Balaji
Decided On: Jul 22, 2025
Case Number: CRP/2117/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arjunan

Respondent

Lakshmi

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 22.07.2025coram :the honourable mr. justice p.b.balaji and arjunan ...petitioner vs.1. lakshmi2. krishnamoorthi3. sakthivel4. palaniyammal5. indira6. kasturi7. panjalai8. kariberiyammal9. devanai10. valliyammal11. the district collector, collectorate,12. the district registrar,13. the sub registrar, page no.1 of 414. the district revenue officer, district revenue office,15. the revenue divisional office,16. the tahsildar, taluk office, uthangarai. ...respondentscivil revision petition filed under article 227 of constitution of india seeking to strike off the plaint in o.s.no.43 of 2023 pending on the file of the sub court at uthangarai as the pending suit on the file of the honble court. for petitioner : m/s.e.pushpa for respondents : no appearance, for r1 to r3 : mr.s.sathish rajan, for r4 to r10 : mr.v.ramesh, ga, for r11 to r16orderwhen the matter is taken up taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this civil revision petition. she has also circulated a letter dated 16.07.2025 page no.2 of 4 to that effect to the registry.2. in view of the above, this civil revision petition standsdismissed as withdrawn. there shall be no order as to costs. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. skt index : yes / no speaking order : yes / no ncc : yes / no to1. the district collector, collectorate, krishnagiri.2. the district registrar,3. the sub registrar,4. the district revenue officer, district revenue office, krishnagiri. page no.3 of 4p.b. balaji, j.skt5. the revenue divisional office,6. the tahsildar, taluk office, uthangarai.7. the sub court, and page no.4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.07.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI and Arjunan ...Petitioner Vs.
1. Lakshmi
2. Krishnamoorthi
3. Sakthivel
4. Palaniyammal
5. Indira
6. Kasturi
7. Panjalai
8. Kariberiyammal
9. Devanai
10. Valliyammal
11. The District Collector, Collectorate,
12. The District Registrar,
13. The Sub Registrar, Page No.1 of 4
14. The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office,
15. The Revenue Divisional Office,
16. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Uthangarai. ...Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India seeking to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.43 of 2023 pending on the file of the Sub Court at Uthangarai as the pending suit on the file of the Honble Court. For Petitioner : M/s.E.Pushpa For Respondents : No appearance, for R1 to R3 : Mr.S.Sathish Rajan, for R4 to R10 : Mr.V.Ramesh, GA, for R11 to R16

ORDER

When the matter is taken up taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition. She has also circulated a letter dated 16.07.2025 Page No.2 of 4 to that effect to the Registry.

2. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition stands

dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. skt Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No To

1. The District Collector, Collectorate, Krishnagiri.

2. The District Registrar,

3. The Sub Registrar,

4. The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Krishnagiri. Page No.3 of 4

P.B. BALAJI, J.

skt

5. The Revenue Divisional Office,

6. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Uthangarai.

7. The Sub Court, and Page No.4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Arjunan vs Lakshmi Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice P.B. Balaji