Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Vishal Beverages (P) Ltd.

Commissioner of C. Ex. vs Vishal Beverages (P) Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jun 08, 2000
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/18439

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of C. Ex.

Respondent

Vishal Beverages (P) Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(2000)(119)ELT739TriDel

Excerpt

1. this appeal at the instance of the revenue is directed against order-in-appeal no. 1460-ce/bpl/99, dated 1-12-1999. the commissioner, while passing the said order, was following the decision of this tribunal in final order no. 1072-1075/99-a, dated 4-8-1999 on appeals filed by the same party. in that final order, this tribunal took the view that bottles and crates are rented out to their customers by the appellants and any profit made by them on this activity is not to be included in the assessable value of excisable goods. we do not find any ground to doubt the correctness of the decision rendered by this tribunal on 4-8-1999. so, we dismiss the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. This appeal at the instance of the Revenue is directed against order-in-appeal No. 1460-CE/BPL/99, dated 1-12-1999. The Commissioner, while passing the said order, was following the decision of this Tribunal in final order No. 1072-1075/99-A, dated 4-8-1999 on appeals filed by the same party. In that final order, this Tribunal took the view that bottles and crates are rented out to their customers by the appellants and any profit made by them on this activity is not to be included in the assessable value of excisable goods. We do not find any ground to doubt the correctness of the decision rendered by this Tribunal on 4-8-1999. So, we dismiss the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial