Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Sabu, vs the State of Kerala,

SABU, vs The State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 02, 2020
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1843607

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/9069/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

SABU,

Respondent

The State of Kerala,

Excerpt

.....chamaparampil smt.asha elizabeth mathew respondents/complainant& alleged injured: 1 the state of kerala, rep. by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam-682031 2 abha.r aged 36 years w/o.late lekshmanan santhosh anush bhavan, alayakonam, pulimath.p.o., chirayinkeezhu thaluk-695612sri.amjad ali - sr.pp this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 02.03.2020, the court on the same day passed the following: criminal m.c.no.9069 of 2019 -----------------------------------------------orderthe petitioner seeks orders quashing annexure - b dated 20.07.2013, in terms of which petitioner is arrayed as an accused in crime no.287 of 2013 of kilimanoor police station. the case set out by the petitioner in the crl.m.c is that the allegations do not make out the offences alleged.2. when this matter was taken up, the learned publicprosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the final report in the case has already been filed in the matter in the year 2015 itself. in so far as it is brought to the notice of this court that the final report indicated has already been filed, the crl.m.c is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the final report in appropriate proceedings, if so advised. sd/- p.b.suresh kumar, judge. pv appendix petitioner's exhibits: annexure a certified copy of the fir in crime no.287/2013 of kilimanoor police station annexure b certified copy of the report submittedby the sub inspector, kilimanoor police station before the judicial first class magistrate court-ii, annexure c true copy of the remand application submitted by the sub inspector,kilimanoor police station on 20.7.2013 before the jfcm court-ii, respondents' exhibits: nil

Full Judgment

, IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR MONDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 12TH PHALGUNA, 1941 CRIME NO.287/2013 OF Kilimanoor Police Station , Thiruvananthapuram PETITIONER/6th ACCUSED: SABU, AGED 48 YEARS S/O.LEKSHMANAN, LAKSHMI VILASOM, PULIMATH.P.O., PULIMATH VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU THALUK-695612 BY ADVS. SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL SMT.ASHA ELIZABETH MATHEW RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT& ALLEGED INJURED: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031 2 ABHA.R AGED 36 YEARS W/O.LATE LEKSHMANAN SANTHOSH ANUSH BHAVAN, ALAYAKONAM, PULIMATH.P.O., CHIRAYINKEEZHU THALUK-695612

SRI.AMJAD ALI - SR.PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Criminal M.C.No.9069 of 2019 -----------------------------------------------

ORDER

The petitioner seeks orders quashing Annexure - B dated 20.07.2013, in terms of which petitioner is arrayed as an accused in Crime No.287 of 2013 of Kilimanoor Police Station. The case set out by the petitioner in the Crl.M.C is that the allegations do not make out the offences alleged.

2. When this matter was taken up, the learned Public

Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the final report in the case has already been filed in the matter in the year 2015 itself. In so far as it is brought to the notice of this Court that the final report indicated has already been filed, the Crl.M.C is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the final report in appropriate proceedings, if so advised. Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE. PV APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.287/2013 OF KILIMANOOR POLICE STATION ANNEXURE B CERTIFIED COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED

BY THE SUB INSPECTOR, KILIMANOOR POLICE STATION BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, ANNEXURE C TRUE COPY OF THE REMAND APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR,KILIMANOOR POLICE STATION ON 20.7.2013 BEFORE THE JFCM COURT-II, RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2020 Same Parties SABU, vs The State of Kerala, Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice P.B.Suresh Kumar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales