Chemo Pulp Tissues Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Chemo Pulp Tissues vs Commissioner of C. Ex.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jun 05, 2000

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/18400

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/18400
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On: Jun 05, 2000
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chemo Pulp Tissues

Respondent

Commissioner of C. Ex.

Legal References

Reported In: (2000)(72)ECC420

Excerpt

"notwithstanding anything contained in any rule of the central excise rules, 1944, no credit of any duty paid on high speed diesel oil at any time during the period commencing on and from the 16th day march, 1995 and ending with the day, the finance act, 2000 receives the assent of the president, shall be deemed to be admissible".the following explanation was also included in that section, which reads- "for the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that no act or omission on the part of any person shall be punishable as an offence which would not have been so punishable if this section had not come into force".this provision has come into force with effect from 12-5-2000. in view of this provision contained in the finance act, we do not find any justification for entertaining these appeals. these appeals are accordingly dismissed. but, we make it clear that in view of the explanation, order imposing penalty is not sustainable. in other words, penalties imposed by the authorities in the impugned orders are found unsustainable.

Full Judgment

"Notwithstanding anything contained in any rule of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, no credit of any duty paid on high speed diesel oil at any time during the period commencing on and from the 16th day March, 1995 and ending with the day, the Finance Act, 2000 receives the assent of the President, shall be deemed to be admissible".

The following Explanation was also included in that Section, which reads- "For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that no act or omission on the part of any person shall be punishable as an offence which would not have been so punishable if this section had not come into force".

This provision has come into force with effect from 12-5-2000. In view of this provision contained in the Finance Act, we do not find any justification for entertaining these appeals. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. But, we make it clear that in view of the Explanation, order imposing penalty is not sustainable. In other words, penalties imposed by the authorities in the impugned orders are found unsustainable.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Chemo Pulp Tissues vs Commissioner of C. Ex. Same Subject Service Tax