Abdulrazak vs the State of Karnataka

Abdulrazak vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Dec 18, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1839695

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1839695
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: M.G.UMA
Decided On: Dec 18, 2024
Case Number: CRL.P/103396/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abdulrazak

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1- in the high court of karnataka, dharwad bench dated this the 18th day of december, 2024 before the hon'ble mrs justice m.g.uma criminal petition no. 103396 of 2024 between: abdulrazak s/o. hayatsaheb maniyar age: 41 years occ: p.d.o. of sangameshwara gram panchayat r/o. chitragar street bazar road kalaghatagi tq. hubballi, dist. dharwad - 581 113 …petitioner (by sri. k.l. patil, advocate) and:1. the state of karnataka through kundagol police stationdigitally signed represented by state public prosecutor by nandini b g high court of karnataka location: high dharwad bench, dharwad - 580 011court of karnataka2. sri. mallikarjun shankrappa meti age: 57 years occ: assistant executive engineer panchayat, kundagol tq: hubballi, dist. dharwad - 581 113 …respondents (by sri. dhayanand sangreeshi, hcgp) -2- this criminal petition is filed under section 482 ofcr.p.c. (528 of bnss), praying to quash the entire proceedings against the petitioner/accused no.2 in kundagol police station crime no.100/2018 which is registered as cc no.268/2024 (old cc no.121/2019) on the file of senior civil judge and cjm court, kundagol, for offences punishable under sections 406, 409, 465, 468, 471 read with section 34 of ipc. this criminal petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following: coram: the hon'ble mrs justice m.g.umaoral orderoffice raised objection regarding maintainability of the petition on the ground that the petitioner has already filed the petition seeking similar prayer. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition and undertakes to file memo to that effect. submission is placed on record. criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- (m.g.uma) judge *bgn/- list no.: 19 sl no.: 3

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103396 OF 2024 BETWEEN: ABDULRAZAK S/O. HAYATSAHEB MANIYAR AGE: 41 YEARS OCC: P.D.O. OF SANGAMESHWARA GRAM PANCHAYAT R/O. CHITRAGAR STREET BAZAR ROAD KALAGHATAGI TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD - 581 113 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.L. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH KUNDAGOL POLICE STATION
Digitally signed        REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
by NANDINI B G          HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Location: high          DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD - 580 011
court of karnataka
2. SRI. MALLIKARJUN SHANKRAPPA METI AGE: 57 YEARS OCC: ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PANCHAYAT, KUNDAGOL TQ: HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD - 581 113 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DHAYANAND SANGREESHI, HCGP) -2- THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF
CR.P.C. (528 OF BNSS), PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 IN KUNDAGOL POLICE STATION CRIME NO.100/2018 WHICH IS REGISTERED AS CC NO.268/2024 (OLD CC NO.121/2019) ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KUNDAGOL, FOR OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 406, 409, 465, 468, 471 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA

ORAL ORDER

Office raised objection regarding maintainability of the petition on the ground that the petitioner has already filed the petition seeking similar prayer. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition and undertakes to file memo to that effect. Submission is placed on record. Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.G.UMA) JUDGE *bgn/- List No.: 19 Sl No.: 3

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties Abdulrazak vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge M.G.UMA