Chitra Devi vs R.Akkumari

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 30, 2025

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1838736

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1838736
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice S. Sounthar
Decided On: Apr 30, 2025
Case Number: CMP/8590/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chitra Devi

Respondent

R.Akkumari

Excerpt

c.m.p.no.8590 of 2025 in c.m.a.sr.no.37641 of 2025s.sounthar,j.this petition has been filed to condone the delay of 13 days in filing the above cma.2. notice to the 1st respondent already dispensed with.3. m/s.r.sree vidhya, learned counsel takes notice for the 2nd respondent.4. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent.5. having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, delay is condoned. c.m.p.no.8590 of 2025 is allowed.6. the registry is directed to number the civil miscellaneous appeal and list the matter for admission, if it is otherwise in order.7. the registry is further directed to print the name of m/s.r.sree vidhya, as counsel for the 2nd respondent in the cause-list at the time of admission. 30.04.2025 dm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.No.8590 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.37641 of 2025

S.SOUNTHAR,J.

This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 13 days in filing the above CMA.

2. Notice to the 1st respondent already dispensed with.

3. M/s.R.Sree Vidhya, learned counsel takes notice for the 2nd respondent.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent.

5. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, delay is condoned. C.M.P.No.8590 of 2025 is allowed.

6. The Registry is directed to number the civil miscellaneous appeal and list the matter for admission, if it is otherwise in order.

7. The Registry is further directed to print the name of M/s.R.Sree Vidhya, as counsel for the 2nd respondent in the cause-list at the time of admission. 30.04.2025 dm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties Chitra Devi vs R.Akkumari Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice S. Sounthar