Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Ramatronics (i) Ltd.

Commissioner of Central Excise vs Ramatronics (i) Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided May 26, 2000

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/18346

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/18346
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On: May 26, 2000
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Respondent

Ramatronics (i) Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In: (2000)(120)ELT492TriDel

Excerpt

1. in this appeal filed by the revenue the matter relates to the classification of the chip on board which were specifically designed to fit into the clock of the watch movements. this chip on board generates basic time signals of one second after stepping up the time signals of the quartz crystals. subsequently the signal of one second is used to generate minute and hour signals mechanically by means of gears. this description finds place in the order in appeal.2. the collector of central excise (appeals) has taken a view that as the chip on board was an article suitable for use solely or principally as part of the clock/watch movement and it was not specifically described elsewhere; as such they were correctly classifiable along with the clock/watch under heading no. 91.14 as other clock or parts.3. no one is present for the respondents. the notice for today's hearing had been issued to them on 10-4-2000. as the matter is old we have considered the matter after hearing shri satnam singh and on going through the order in appeal we do not find that it calls for any interference. as a result the appeal filed by the revenue is rejected.ordered accordingly.

Full Judgment

1. In this appeal filed by the Revenue the matter relates to the classification of the Chip on Board which were specifically designed to fit into the clock of the watch movements. This chip on board generates basic time signals of one second after stepping up the time signals of the quartz crystals. Subsequently the signal of one second is used to generate minute and hour signals mechanically by means of gears. This description finds place in the order in appeal.

2. The Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) has taken a view that as the chip on board was an article suitable for use solely or principally as part of the clock/watch movement and it was not specifically described elsewhere; as such they were correctly classifiable along with the clock/watch under Heading No. 91.14 as other clock or parts.

3. No one is present for the respondents. The notice for today's hearing had been issued to them on 10-4-2000. As the matter is old we have considered the matter after hearing Shri Satnam Singh and on going through the order in appeal we do not find that it calls for any interference. As a result the appeal filed by the Revenue is rejected.

Ordered accordingly.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Commissioner of Central Excise vs Ramatronics (i) Ltd. Same Subject Education