Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hamid Sultan Vs Marimithupandian

Hamid Sultan vs Marimithupandian

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 28, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1829222

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CONT P/44/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hamid Sultan

Respondent

Marimithupandian

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 28.02.2025coram:the hon'ble mr.justice m.dhandapani hamid sultan ... petitioner vs. thiru.mari muthu pandian additional chief secretary to govt., revenue and disaster management secretariat, fort st.george, chennai. ... respondent prayer : contempt petition filed under section 11 of the contempt of courts act praying to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience oforder dated 17.06.2022 passed in w.p.no.14179 of 2016.for petitioner : m/s.j.r.k.bhavanantham for respondent : mr.a.selvendran special government pleaderorderthis contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of theorder dated 17.06.2022 made in w.p.no.14179 of 2016.2.since compensation was not paid for the taking over of the surplus land under the tamil nadu urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, the writ petition in w.p.no.14179 of 2016 was filed before this court. this court vide order dated 17.06.2022 made in w.p.no.14179 of 2016, issued direction to the respondents therein to pay the compensation with eligible interest, pursuant to which, the state government has issued letter dated 25.02.2025 assessing the value of the excess vacant land acquired as rs.1,73,328/-.3.in view of the above, this contempt petition is closed. the respondent is directed to pay the amount within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out the remedy in the manner known to law, if so aggrieved by the compensation. pri index: yes/no speaking order: yes/no ncc: yes/nom.dhandapani,j.pri contempt petition no.44 of 2025

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.02.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Hamid Sultan ... Petitioner Vs. Thiru.Mari Muthu Pandian Additional Chief Secretary to Govt., Revenue and Disaster Management Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai. ... Respondent Prayer : Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of

order dated 17.06.2022 passed in W.P.No.14179 of 2016.

For Petitioner : M/s.J.R.K.Bhavanantham For Respondent : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader

ORDER

This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the

order dated 17.06.2022 made in W.P.No.14179 of 2016.

2.Since compensation was not paid for the taking over of the surplus land under the Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, the writ petition in W.P.No.14179 of 2016 was filed before this Court. This Court vide order dated 17.06.2022 made in W.P.No.14179 of 2016, issued direction to the respondents therein to pay the compensation with eligible interest, pursuant to which, the State Government has issued letter dated 25.02.2025 assessing the value of the excess vacant land acquired as Rs.1,73,328/-.

3.In view of the above, this Contempt Petition is closed. The respondent is directed to pay the amount within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out the remedy in the manner known to law, if so aggrieved by the compensation. pri Index: Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No NCC: Yes/No

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

pri Contempt Petition No.44 of 2025

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial