RM.Subbiah Vs State rep. by, The Inspector of Police,

RM.Subbiah vs State rep. by, The Inspector of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 07, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1825614

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1825614
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan
Decided On: Mar 07, 2025
Case Number: CRL OP/6426/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

RM.Subbiah

Respondent

State rep. by, The Inspector of Police,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 07.03.2025coram:the hon`ble mr.justice sunder mohan rm. subbiah ... petitioner / accused vs state rep. by:- the inspector of police, ashok nagar, chennai - 600 083. ... respondent/complainant [cr. no.not known of 2025] prayer: - the criminal original petition is filed under section 482 of b.n.s.s., praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner / accused in crime no.not known of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. for petitioner : mr.karthik lakshmanan arunachalam for respondent : mr.s.santhosh government advocate (crl.side)orderthe petitioner / accused, who apprehends arrest in the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 406 & 420 of ipc in connection with the case in crime no.not known of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.2. the learned government advocate (crl.side) on instructions submitted that a petition enquiry is pending and an fir has not been registered.3. in view of the same, the respondent shall conduct and concludethe enquiry within a period of three weeks from today. if the petitioner's appearance is required, the respondent shall issue a notice under section 35 of bnss, 2023 and since the petitioner is aged 90 years, on summons, he may send a written reply through a representative to the queries raised by the respondent. till the conclusion of the enquiry, the respondent police shall not arrest the petitioner.4. with the above directions, this criminal original petition is disposed of. ars sunder mohan. j., ars to 1.the public prosecutor, high court, madras.2. the inspector of police, ashok nagar, chennai - 600 083

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 07.03.2025
CORAM:
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN RM. Subbiah ... Petitioner / Accused Vs State rep. by:- The Inspector of Police, Ashok Nagar, Chennai - 600 083. ... Respondent/Complainant [Cr. No.Not known of 2025] PRAYER: - The Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner / Accused in Crime No.Not known of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.Karthik Lakshmanan Arunachalam For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner / Accused, who apprehends arrest in the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406 & 420 of IPC in connection with the case in Crime No.Not known of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on instructions submitted that a petition enquiry is pending and an FIR has not been registered.

3. In view of the same, the respondent shall conduct and conclude

the enquiry within a period of three weeks from today. If the petitioner's appearance is required, the respondent shall issue a notice under Section 35 of BNSS, 2023 and since the petitioner is aged 90 years, on summons, he may send a written reply through a representative to the queries raised by the respondent. Till the conclusion of the enquiry, the respondent police shall not arrest the petitioner.

4. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. ars SUNDER MOHAN. J., ars To 1.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

2. The Inspector of Police, Ashok Nagar, Chennai - 600 083

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties RM.Subbiah vs State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan