The Friends Association vs the State of Karnataka

The Friends Association vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 31, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1824641

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1824641
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Jyoti Mulimani
Decided On: Jul 31, 2024
Case Number: WP/103421/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Friends Association

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1- in the high court of karnataka, dharwad bench dated this the 31st day of july, 2024 before the hon'ble ms. justice jyoti mulimani writ petition no. 103421 of 2022 (excise) between: the friends association, represented by its president, shri. jagadishappa s/o. fakirappa huggi, age: 75 years, occ: business, r/o: ron-gajendragad road, soodi village, tal: ron, dist: gadag-582 211. …petitioner (by sri. h.r.deshpande., advocate) and:1. the state of karnataka, represented by its principal secretary, department of excise, m.s.building, digitally signed by thejaskumar n location: high2. the commissioner for excise, court of 2nd floor, ttmc building, karnataka a block, bmtc, shantinagar,3. the deputy commissioner for excise, gadag district, gadag-581 117.4. the excise inspector, ron range, tal: ron, dist: gadag-582 209.5. the superintendent of police, gadag district, gadag-582 101. -2-6. the police inspector,gajendragad police station, dist: gadag-582 101. …respondents (by sri. shivaprabhu.s.hiremath., aga) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, seeking certain reliefs. this writ petition is listed for preliminary hearing in ‘b’ group, this day, an order is made as under:oral ordersri.h.r.deshpande., learned counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person. counsel submits that a memo has been filed stating that the writ petition has become infructuous and as such the petition does not survive for consideration. counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the writ petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. when queried, counsel submits that a conscious submission is made about the infructuous of the petition. the oral submission and the memo are placed on record. -3- the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. sd/- (jyoti mulimani) judge tkn list no.: 2 sl no.: 61

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 103421 OF 2022 (EXCISE) BETWEEN: THE FRIENDS ASSOCIATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SHRI. JAGADISHAPPA S/O. FAKIRAPPA HUGGI, AGE: 75 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: RON-GAJENDRAGAD ROAD, SOODI VILLAGE, TAL: RON, DIST: GADAG-582 211. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.R.DESHPANDE., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE, M.S.BUILDING, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH
2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR EXCISE, COURT OF 2ND FLOOR, TTMC BUILDING, KARNATAKA A BLOCK, BMTC, SHANTINAGAR,
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER FOR EXCISE, GADAG DISTRICT, GADAG-581 117.
4. THE EXCISE INSPECTOR, RON RANGE, TAL: RON, DIST: GADAG-582 209.
5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GADAG DISTRICT, GADAG-582 101. -2-
6. THE POLICE INSPECTOR,
GAJENDRAGAD POLICE STATION, DIST: GADAG-582 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHIVAPRABHU.S.HIREMATH., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

Sri.H.R.Deshpande., learned counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition has become infructuous and as such the petition does not survive for consideration. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious submission is made about the infructuous of the petition. The oral submission and the memo are placed on record. -3- The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 61

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties The Friends Association vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge Jyoti Mulimani