P.Sekar vs C.Perumal

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jul 30, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1819868

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1819868
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
Decided On: Jul 30, 2025
Case Number: CRL A/428/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Sekar

Respondent

C.Perumal

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30-07-2025coramthe honourable mr.justice d.bharatha chakravarthy and1. p.sekar s/o.late perumal, mylampatty, thindamangalam village, omalur taluk,salem district appellant(s) vs1. c.perumal s/o.chinnusamy, kavin hospital, 16/6, ummai mariyamman koil street omalur town, salem district respondent(s)1. c.arumugam s/o chinnu, mylampatty, panankattur, thindamangalam village, omalur taluk, salem district appellant(s) vs1. g.sangeetha w/o dr.c.perumal, kavin hospital, omalur town, salem district respondent(s)prayer the criminal appeal is filed under section 378 (4) of the criminal procedure code, against the order dated 28.02.2022 made in stc no.16 of 2021 on the file of the judicial magistrate, (fast track court at magisterial level), omalur. prayer the criminal appeal is filed under section 378 of the criminal procedure code, against the order dated 03.03.2022 made in stc no.1 of 2021 on the file of the judicial magistrate, (fast track court at magisterial level), omalur. in both appeals: for appellant(s): mr.s.manikandan for respondent(s): mr.c.prabakaran.common orderthese two appeals are directed against the judgements of the trial court for acquitting the respondent/accused.2. pending appeals, it is stated that both parties have settled the issueamicably, the amounts have been paid, and the appellant/complainant has received the amount in full quit . 3.a joint memorandum of compromise is filed in both cases, which is signed by the parties as well as the learned counsel. therefore, the appeals are disposed of in terms of the joint memorandum of compromise, and the offences have been treated as compounded. 30-07-2025 jrs index:yesspeaking orderinternet:yes to the judicial magistrate, (fast track court at magisterial level), omalur. d.bharatha chakravarthy j. jrs and crl a no. 429 of 30-07-2025

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30-07-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY AND
1. P.Sekar S/o.Late Perumal, Mylampatty, Thindamangalam Village, Omalur Taluk,Salem District Appellant(s) Vs
1. C.Perumal S/o.Chinnusamy, Kavin Hospital, 16/6, Ummai Mariyamman Koil Street Omalur Town, Salem District Respondent(s)
1. C.Arumugam S/o Chinnu, Mylampatty, Panankattur, Thindamangalam Village, Omalur Taluk, Salem District Appellant(s) Vs
1. G.Sangeetha W/o Dr.C.Perumal, Kavin Hospital, Omalur Town, Salem District Respondent(s)
PRAYER The Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, against the order dated 28.02.2022 made in STC No.16 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, (Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level), Omalur. PRAYER The Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, against the order dated 03.03.2022 made in STC No.1 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, (Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level), Omalur. IN both appeals: For Appellant(s): Mr.S.Manikandan For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran.

COMMON ORDER

These two appeals are directed against the judgements of the trial Court for acquitting the respondent/accused.

2. Pending appeals, it is stated that both parties have settled the issue

amicably, the amounts have been paid, and the appellant/complainant has received the amount in Full quit . 3.A joint memorandum of compromise is filed in both cases, which is signed by the parties as well as the learned counsel. Therefore, the appeals are disposed of in terms of the joint memorandum of compromise, and the offences have been treated as compounded. 30-07-2025 jrs Index:Yes

Speaking order

Internet:Yes To The Judicial Magistrate, (Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level), Omalur. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J. jrs AND CRL A NO. 429 OF 30-07-2025

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties P.Sekar vs C.Perumal Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy