Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

The Executive Engineer No.1 vs the Assistant Commissioner Cum

The Executive Engineer No.1 vs The Assistant Commissioner Cum

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Nov 29, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1819709

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MSA/100056/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Executive Engineer No.1

Respondent

The Assistant Commissioner Cum

Excerpt

in the high court of karnataka, dharwad bench, dharwad dated this 29th day of november, 2024 beforehon'ble mr. justice c.m.poonachamsa no 100056 of 2023 (lac) between1. the executive engineer no.1 tungabhadra water division, munirabad, tq-dist. koppal-2. the managing director kar. neeravari ningam, throught ex. engineer, no.1, singatalur yetaneeravari yojane, mundaragi, dist.gadag.-582118 ...appellants (by sri: shivaraj.c.bellakki, advocate) and1. the assistant commissioner cum land acquisition officer, koppal, tq and dist. koppal-5832312. sri. hanumappa s/o. yellappa muradi aged about. 78 years, occ. agriculture, r/o.3. sri. balappa s/o. yellappa muradi aged about. 76 years, occ. agriculture, r/o.4. sri. hulagappa s/o. yellappa muradiaged about. 73 years, occ. agriculture, r/o. ... respondents msa is filed u/sec. 54 (2) of the land acquisition act, 1894., praying to.,i. allow the appeal and set aside thejudgment and award passed by the learned principaldistrict and sessions judge, koppal, in laca no. 166/2015, dated 04.12.2021 and confirm the judgment and award passed in lac no. 82/1998 dated 30.11.1998 passed by the civil judge and additional chief judicial magistrate koppal in lac no. 79/1998, and ii. grant such other reliefs that this honble court may deems fit in the interest of justice and equity.this appeal coming on for orders this day, the court made the following;orderoffice objections to be complied with within four weeks, failing which the above appeal shall automatically stand dismissed without further orders from the court. judge note: as per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 27.01.2025, the advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objections at sl. no. 4,5,6,8,11. hence, this msa no. 100056/2023 stand dismissed without further orders from the court as per the court order dated 29.11.2024. by order of the court assistant registrar. r- by:-rv c- by:-rv t- by:-psl

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M.POONACHA

MSA NO 100056 OF 2023 (LAC) BETWEEN

1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NO.1 TUNGABHADRA WATER DIVISION, MUNIRABAD, TQ-DIST. KOPPAL-

2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KAR. NEERAVARI NINGAM, THROUGHT EX. ENGINEER, NO.1, SINGATALUR YETANEERAVARI YOJANE, MUNDARAGI, DIST.GADAG.-582118 ...APPELLANTS (By Sri: SHIVARAJ.C.BELLAKKI, ADVOCATE) AND

1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CUM LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KOPPAL, TQ AND DIST. KOPPAL-583231

2. SRI. HANUMAPPA S/O. YELLAPPA MURADI AGED ABOUT. 78 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.

3. SRI. BALAPPA S/O. YELLAPPA MURADI AGED ABOUT. 76 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.

4. SRI. HULAGAPPA S/O. YELLAPPA MURADI

AGED ABOUT. 73 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. ... RESPONDENTS MSA IS FILED U/SEC. 54 (2) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894., PRAYING TO.,i. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOPPAL, IN LACA NO. 166/2015, DATED 04.12.2021 AND CONFIRM THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED IN LAC NO. 82/1998 DATED 30.11.1998 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KOPPAL IN LAC NO. 79/1998, AND ii. GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY DEEMS FIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following;

ORDER

Office objections to be complied with within four weeks, failing which the above appeal shall automatically stand dismissed without further orders from the Court. JUDGE Note: As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 27.01.2025, the Advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objections at Sl. No. 4,5,6,8,11. Hence, this MSA No. 100056/2023 stand dismissed without further orders from the Court as per the court order dated 29.11.2024. BY ORDER OF THE COURT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. R- By:-rv C- By:-rv T- BY:-psl

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties The Executive Engineer No.1 vs The Assistant Commissioner Cum Same Judge C.M. Poonacha

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales