Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Aneesh vs State of Kerala

Aneesh vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 05, 2020
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1813713

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./7002/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aneesh

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice ashok menon thursday, the 05th day of november 2020 / 14th karthika, 1942 crime no.12/2020 of devikulam excise range office , idukki petitioner/a3: aneesh aged 18 years s/o. gopal raj, 8th muri lane, ellupetty estate, west division, kdh village, devikulam taluk, idukki district. by adv. sri.latheesh sebastian respondent/s: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala r1 by public prosecutor other present: sri.ajith murali - pp this bail application having come up for admission on 05.11.2020, the court on the same day passed the following:o r d e rdated this the 5th day of november 2020 the applicant is the third accused in crime no.12/2020 of devikulam excise range for having allegedly committed offences punishable under sections58 and 67b of the abkari act. the applicant states that he was a juvenile on the date of alleged occurrence and had not attained the age of 18. the applicant has also produced birth certificate and school leaving certificate to substantiate his submission that he was a juvenile. under thecircumstances, the investigating officer is directed to investigate in this regard and the applicant is directed to surrender before the jurisdictional court and seek the benefit of juvenility to be produced before the juvenile court of competent jurisdiction. the bail application is disposed of with the above observation. sd/- ashok menon judge jg

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON THURSDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 14TH KARTHIKA, 1942 CRIME NO.12/2020 OF Devikulam Excise Range Office , Idukki PETITIONER/A3: ANEESH AGED 18 YEARS S/O. GOPAL RAJ, 8TH MURI LANE, ELLUPETTY ESTATE, WEST DIVISION, KDH VILLAGE, DEVIKULAM TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT/S: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OTHER PRESENT: SRI.AJITH MURALI - PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

Dated this the 5th day of November 2020 The applicant is the third accused in Crime No.12/2020 of Devikulam Excise Range for having allegedly committed offences punishable under Sections

58 and 67B of the Abkari Act.                          The applicant states
that     he     was    a    juvenile          on     the     date     of       alleged
occurrence and had not attained the age of 18.                                     The
applicant       has     also      produced          birth     certificate          and
school        leaving       certificate             to      substantiate           his
submission        that      he      was       a    juvenile.            Under      the

circumstances, the investigating officer is directed to investigate in this regard and the applicant is directed to surrender before the jurisdictional court and seek the benefit of juvenility to be produced before the Juvenile Court of competent jurisdiction. The bail application is disposed of with the above observation. Sd/- ASHOK MENON JUDGE jg

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial