Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Gururaj vs the State of Karnataka

Gururaj vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 30, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1811266

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/102482/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gururaj

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....board, belagavi, dist: belagavi-590001. …respondents (by sri. praveen.k.uppar aga for r1; sri. p.n. hatti, adv. for r4; r3-served) -2- this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227of the constitution of india praying to issue the writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned proceedings/order vide annexure-f dated:26.02.2016 under subject no.2.7 passed by the respondent no.2/belagavi district level single window clearance committee in so far it relates to annulling/cancelling the auction/ successful bid of petitioner in respect of industrial site no.886 of kanbargi/auto nagar industrial area, belagavi; issue the writ in the nature of certiorari quashing theimpugned consequential re-auction notice signed dated:04.03.2016 vide annexure-g issued by respondent no.4 in so far it relates to industrial site no.886 of kanbargi/auto nagar industrial area, belagavi and etc. this petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following: coram: the hon'ble mr. justice h.p.sandeshoral order(per: the hon'ble mr. justice h.p.sandesh) the counsel for the petitioner submits that matter has become infructous. in view of the submission of petitioner counsel, the petition is dismissed as infrouctous. sd/- (h.p.sandesh) judge pmp ct-mck list no.: 1 sl no.: 13

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH WRIT PETITION NO. 102482 OF 2016 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN: GURURAJ S/O. SUBASH KARNING, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, PLOT NO.2426, SECTOR NO.12, MEHANTESH NAGAR, BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI-590001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAYENDRA BHIMAKKANAVAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU.

2. THE BELGAUM DISTRICT SINGLE WINDOW CLEARANCE COMMITTEE, KIADB, BELAGAVI, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT/CHAIRMAN, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI,

Digitally signed by SAROJA DIST: BELAGAVI-590001. HANGARAKI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 3. THE JOINT-SECRETARY, DHARWAD BENCH DISTRICT INDUSTRIAL CENTER, Date: 2024.08.01 14:57:01 +0530 UDYAM BHAG, BELAGAVI, MEMBER-SECRETARY, DISTRICT SINGLE WINDOW COMMITTEE, KIADB, BELAGAVI-590001.

4. THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,

KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD, BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI-590001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN.K.UPPAR AGA FOR R1; SRI. P.N. HATTI, ADV. FOR R4; R3-SERVED) -2- THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE THE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED PROCEEDINGS/ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE-F DATED:26.02.2016 UNDER SUBJECT NO.2.7 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2/BELAGAVI DISTRICT LEVEL SINGLE WINDOW CLEARANCE COMMITTEE IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO ANNULLING/CANCELLING THE AUCTION/ SUCCESSFUL BID OF PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF INDUSTRIAL SITE NO.886 OF KANBARGI/AUTO NAGAR INDUSTRIAL AREA, BELAGAVI; ISSUE THE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE

IMPUGNED CONSEQUENTIAL RE-AUCTION NOTICE SIGNED DATED:04.03.2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-G ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.4 IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO INDUSTRIAL SITE NO.886 OF KANBARGI/AUTO NAGAR INDUSTRIAL AREA, BELAGAVI AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH) The counsel for the petitioner submits that matter has become infructous. In view of the submission of petitioner counsel, the petition is dismissed as infrouctous. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE PMP CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties Gururaj vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge H.P.Sandesh

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales