Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

M.Murugavel B.E., Vs The Commissioner

M.Murugavel B.E., vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Sep 26, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1802104

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/5641/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M.Murugavel B.E.,

Respondent

The Commissioner

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 26.09.2025coram:the honourable mrs. justice r.kalaimathi and m.murugavel ... petitioner vs.secretariat, chennai-600 009. ... respondents prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned notice issued by the 1st respondent in na.ka.no.c3/16294/2017 dated 26.02.2018 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner for the post of assistant engineer based on the degree qualification in engineering and also based on the orders issued by the government in g.o.m.s.no.79 maws department dated 30.04.2001.for petitioner : mr.t.ranganathan for 1st respondent : mr.haja nazirudeen, additional advocate general assisted by mrs.n.devi for respondents 2 and 3: mr.s.rajesh, govt.advocateorderthe sum and substance of the writ petition is that he is working as technical assistant and the 1st respondent is to consider him for the post of assistant engineer based on the degree qualification in engineering.2. w.p.no.2640 of 2024 has been filed wherein the writ petitioner,mr.murugavel is the 3rd petitioner, it has been stated that he along with other four persons were promoted temporarily under proceedings of salem city municipal corporation dated 20.01.2024 in na.ka.no.c3/10260/2021 and thereafter, he was demoted and now he is working as assistant engineer in the salem municipal corporation. therefore, this writ petition stands dismissed as it has become infructuous. there is no order as to costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.index : yes / no neutral citation case : yes / nospeaking order / non-speaking orderssn r.kalaimathi, j., ssn to secretariat, chennai-600 009. and

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26.09.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI and M.Murugavel ... Petitioner Vs.

Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned notice issued by the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.C3/16294/2017 dated 26.02.2018 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner for the post of Assistant Engineer based on the Degree qualification in Engineering and also based on the orders issued by the Government in G.O.M.S.No.79 MAWS Department dated 30.04.2001.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Ranganathan For 1st Respondent : Mr.Haja Nazirudeen, Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mrs.N.Devi For Respondents 2 and 3: Mr.S.Rajesh, Govt.Advocate

ORDER

The sum and substance of the writ petition is that he is working as Technical Assistant and the 1st respondent is to consider him for the post of Assistant Engineer based on the Degree qualification in Engineering.

2. W.P.No.2640 of 2024 has been filed wherein the writ petitioner,

Mr.Murugavel is the 3rd petitioner, it has been stated that he along with other four persons were promoted temporarily under Proceedings of Salem City Municipal Corporation dated 20.01.2024 in Na.Ka.No.C3/10260/2021 and thereafter, he was demoted and now he is working as Assistant Engineer in the Salem Municipal Corporation. Therefore, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as it has become infructuous. There is no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation Case : Yes / No

Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order

ssn R.KALAIMATHI, J., ssn To Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. and

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial