Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shinto vs State of Kerala

Shinto vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Sep 23, 2020
~6 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1802047

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./5885/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shinto

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.v.kunhikrishnan wednesday, the 23rd day of september 2020 / 1st aswina, 1942 bail appl..no.5885 of 2020 crime no.1459/2020 of ollur police station, thrissur petitioner/accused: shinto, aged 26 years son of anto, pallissery house, ollur village, anchery desom, thrissur taluk thrissur, pin-680306by adv. sri.rajit respondent: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala ernakulam- 682031 sri.ajith murali, pp this bail application having come up for admission on 23.09.2020, the court on the same day passed the following: b.a.no.5885 of 2020 2o r d e rdated this the 23rd day of september 2020 thi sbai ion fil ed undersect ion 439 ofcr imi nalpr ocedur e codewashear dthr oughvi deoconf erence. 2.the pet iti sthe accused i n cr ime no. 1459 of2020 ofol lur pol ice st ati on,thr issurdi str ict . the above case i sregi ster ed agai he pet iti ,al legi ng of fencespuni shabl eundersect ions376 ( 2),354,354a ( 1),363ofi .p. c & sect ion6r th 5( l),8r th7,12r th11 ( iv)oft he pocso act . 3.thepr ion casei sthat ,thepet iti onercommi tted penet rat ive sexuali nter cour se wi tht cti m. att hatt ime t cti m wasaged 17 year sand4mont hs. 4.hear dthel ear nedcounself ort iti onerandt hel ear nedpubl ic pr or.5. the lear ned counsel f or t iti oner submi hat ,the pet iti onerhasnotcommi he of fence.the counselsubmi hat ,the al legat ion agai nst t iti oner i sthat iti oner commi tted r ape dur he per iod f rom 29. 04. 2019 t o 05. 07.2020. admittedl y,now t he vi cti m i smaj or. now t cti m i scomi ng wi tht he pr esentcase.l ear ned thecounselsubmi ttedt hat ,thepet iti sreadyt oabi deanycondi tions, i fthi scour tgr anthi m bai l. b.a.no.5885 of 2020 36. the lear or opposed t he bai l appl ion. the l ear orsubmi hat ,two cases ar eregi ster ed agai iti ,based on t he st atementoft cti m i nthi scase. the l ear orsubmi hat iti onermay notbe r eleasedonbai latt hisst age......

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020 / 1ST ASWINA, 1942 Bail Appl..No.5885 OF 2020 CRIME NO.1459/2020 OF Ollur Police Station, Thrissur PETITIONER/ACCUSED: SHINTO, AGED 26 YEARS SON OF ANTO, PALLISSERY HOUSE, OLLUR VILLAGE, ANCHERY DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK THRISSUR, PIN-680306

BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM- 682031 SRI.AJITH MURALI, PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.09.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.No.5885 of 2020 2

O R D E R

Dated this the 23rd day of September 2020 Thi sBai ion fil ed underSect ion 439 ofCr imi nalPr ocedur e Codewashear dthr oughVi deoConf erence. 2.The Pet iti sthe accused i n Cr ime No. 1459 of2020 ofOl lur Pol ice St ati on,Thr issurDi str ict . The above case i sregi ster ed agai he pet iti ,al legi ng of fencespuni shabl eunderSect ions376 ( 2),354,354A ( 1),363ofI .P. C & Sect ion6r th 5( l),8r th7,12r th11 ( iv)oft he POCSO Act . 3.Thepr ion casei sthat ,thepet iti onercommi tted penet rat ive sexuali nter cour se wi tht cti m. Att hatt ime t cti m wasaged 17 year sand4mont hs. 4.Hear dthel ear nedcounself ort iti onerandt hel ear nedPubl ic Pr or.

5. The l

ear ned counsel f or t iti oner submi hat ,the pet iti onerhasnotcommi he of fence.The counselsubmi hat ,the al legat ion agai nst t iti oner i sthat iti oner commi tted r ape dur he per iod f rom 29. 04. 2019 t o 05. 07.

2020. Admi

ttedl y,now t he vi cti m i smaj or. Now t cti m i scomi ng wi tht he pr esentcase.l ear ned Thecounselsubmi ttedt hat ,thepet iti sreadyt oabi deanycondi tions, i fthi scour tgr anthi m bai l. B.A.No.5885 of 2020 3

6. The l

ear or opposed t he bai l appl ion. The l ear orsubmi hat ,two cases ar eregi ster ed agai iti ,based on t he st atementoft cti m i nthi scase. The l ear orsubmi hat iti onermay notbe r eleasedonbai latt hisst age. 7.Admi ttedl y,t iti sin cust rom 16. 07. 2020 onwar ds. The pet iti onerfil edabai ionbef oret tear lierandt hatbai l appl ion wasdi smi ssed byt ton 07. 09.

2020. Annexur

e-3i sthe or der . Ther eaf ter iti oner fil ed t his bai ion agai n. The pet iti oner pr oduced Annexur e-4, t he i nvi tat ion car d showi ng t hat , hi s br otheri sget ting marr ied on 27. 09.

2020. I tist rue t hat ,the al legat ions agai iti onerar ever yser ious.Butt iti sincust rom

16. 07.

2020onwar ds.Now hei sincust orabout67days. 8.Consi der he ent iref act s and ci rcumst ances oft he case and consi der he f act t hat t iti oner i sin cust ody f rom 16. 07. onwar ds, I t hink t his bai l appl ion can be al lowed on st ringent condi tions. 9.Mor eover ,consi der he need t ofol low soci aldi stanci ng nor ms i nsi depr isonssoast oaver tthespr eadoft henovelCor onaVi rusPandemi c, t he Hon' ble Supr eme Cour tin Re:Cont agi on of COVI D-19 Vi rus I n Pri sons case ( Suo M ot u Wri t Pet iti on( C) No. 1 of 2020) and a Ful l Bench oft his Cour tin W. P(C) No. 9400 of2020 i ssued var ious sal utar y di ionsf ormi nimi zingt henumberofi nmat esi nsi depr isons. 10.Mor eover ,iti sawel laccept ed pr inci plet hatt hebai list herul e B.A.No.5885 of 2020 4 and t he j aili s t he except ion. The Hon' ble Supr eme Cour t i n Chi dambaram.P v Di orat e of Enf orcement ( 2019 ( 16) SCALE 870) ,af terconsi der ing al lthe ear lierj udgment s,obser ved t hat ,the basi c j uri sprudence r elat o bai lremai nst he same i nasmuch ast he gr antof bai list herul eandr efusali stheexcept ionsoast oensur ethatt heaccused hast heoppor tuni tyofsecur ingf airt rial . 11.Consi der he di ctum l aid down i nthe above deci sion and consi der ingt hef act sandci rcumst ancesoft hiscase,t hisBai ioni s al lowedwi tht hef oll owi ngdi ions:

1. Pet

iti l be r eleased on bai l on execut ing a bond f or Rs. 50, 000/ - ( Rupees Fi fty Thousand onl y)wi tht wo sol ventsur eti es f or t he l ike sum t othesat isf act ionoft hej uri sdi cti t.

2. The pet

iti l appear bef ore t he I ing Of ficer f or i nterr ogat ion as and when r equi red. The pet iti l co- oper ate wi th t he i ion and shal lnot ,di ly ori ndi ly make any i nducement ,thr eat or pr omi se t o any per son acquai nted wi tht hef act soft hecasesoast odi ssuade hi m f rom di scl osi ng such f act stot he Cour tort o any pol iceof ficer .

3. Pet

iti l not l eave I ndi a wi thout per missi onoft hej uri sdi cti t. 4.Pet iti onershal lnotcommi tan of fence si mil ar B.A.No.5885 of 2020 5 t otheof fenceofwhi ch hei saccused,orsuspect ed,of t hecommi ssi onofwhi chhei ssuspect ed.

5. The pet

iti l st rict ly abi de by t he var iousgui del inesi ssued byt heSt ateGover nmentand Cent ralGovernmentwi thr espectt o keepi ng ofsoci al di stanci ngi nthewakeofCovi d19pandemi c.

6. The pet iti l appear bef ore t he I ing Of ficer on al lMondays and Fr idays at 10. a.m. t ill t he final r epor t i s fil ed i n Cr ime No. 1459/

2020. The pet

iti l not ent er t he j uri sdi cti onall imi tofOl lurPol ice St ati on,t illt he final r epor tisfil edi nCr imeNo. 1459/ 2020. 7.I fany oft he above condi tionsar e vi olat ed by t iti ,the j uri sdi cti tcan cancelt he bai lin accor dance t olaw, even t hough t he bai lis gr ant edbyt t. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE NB

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial