B Anoopkumar vs the Excise Commissioner in Karnataka

B Anoopkumar vs The Excise Commissioner in Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 31, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1799539

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1799539
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Jyoti Mulimani
Decided On: Jul 31, 2024
Case Number: WP/20300/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

B Anoopkumar

Respondent

The Excise Commissioner in Karnataka

Excerpt

-1- in the high court of karnataka, dharwad bench dated this the 31st day of july, 2024 before the hon'ble ms. justice jyoti mulimani writ petition no. 20300 of 2018 (excise) between: b.anoopkumar s/o. mahesh.b., aged about 43 years, cl-9 licensee, king choice bar and restaurant, door no.188, tcs no.318/12a/2, plot no.18, moka road, gandhinagara, ballari-583 101. …petitioner (by smt. sudha.d., advocate) and:1. the excise commissioner in karnataka,2nd floor, ttmc, 'a' block, bmtc building, shanthinagar, digitally signed by thejaskumar n bengaluru-560 027. location: high court of karnataka 2. the deputy commissioner, ballari district,3. the deputy commissioner of excise, ballari district, ballari-583 101.4. the inspector of excise,range-i, ballari district, …respondents (by sri. shivaprabhu.s.hiremath., aga) -2- this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, seeking certain reliefs. this writ petition is listed for preliminary hearing in ‘b’ group, this day, an order is made as under:oral ordersmt.sudha.d., learned counsel on behalf of sri.g.k.bhat., for the petitioner has appeared through video conferencing. sri.shivaprabhu s.hiremath., learned aga for the respondents has appeared in person. counsel smt.sudha.d., submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. when queried, counsel smt.sudha.d., submits that a conscious submission is made about the infructuous of the petition. the oral submission made by learned counsel smt.sudha.d., is placed on record. the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. sd/- (jyoti mulimani) judge tkn list no.: 2 sl no.: 51

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 20300 OF 2018 (EXCISE) BETWEEN: B.ANOOPKUMAR S/O. MAHESH.B., AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, CL-9 LICENSEE, KING CHOICE BAR AND RESTAURANT, DOOR NO.188, TCS NO.318/12A/2, PLOT NO.18, MOKA ROAD, GANDHINAGARA, BALLARI-583 101. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SUDHA.D., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER IN KARNATAKA,

2ND FLOOR, TTMC, 'A' BLOCK, BMTC BUILDING, SHANTHINAGAR, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N BENGALURU-560 027. Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BALLARI DISTRICT,

3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, BALLARI DISTRICT, BALLARI-583 101.

4. THE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE,

RANGE-I, BALLARI DISTRICT, …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHIVAPRABHU.S.HIREMATH., AGA) -2- THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

Smt.Sudha.D., learned counsel on behalf of Sri.G.K.Bhat., for the petitioner has appeared through video conferencing. Sri.Shivaprabhu S.Hiremath., learned AGA for the respondents has appeared in person. Counsel Smt.Sudha.D., submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Smt.Sudha.D., submits that a conscious submission is made about the infructuous of the petition. The oral submission made by learned counsel Smt.Sudha.D., is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 51

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties B Anoopkumar vs The Excise Commissioner in Karnataka Same Judge Jyoti Mulimani