Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kariyappa vs the General Manager

Kariyappa vs The General Manager

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jun 27, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1799128

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/111112/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kariyappa

Respondent

The General Manager

Excerpt

-1- in the high court of karnataka, dharwad bench dated this the 27th day of june, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice sachin shankar magadum writ petition no.111112 of 2019 (gm-res) between: kariyappa, helper, construction dept., bengaluru contonment, dharwad. … petitioner (by sri hemanthkumar l. havaragi, advocate) and:1. the general manager, karnataka-580020.2. principal chief personnel officer, ashpak kashimsa karnataka-580020. … respondents digitally signed by ashpak kashimsa location: high court of karnataka, dharwad bench date: 2024.06.28 13:27:05 +0530this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of constitution of india, praying to issue a writ mandamus directing to the railway administration to observe and implement the ruling as a whole to all the railway servants and for some selected people who have approached the court of law and etc. this petition coming on for orders this day, the court made the following: -2-order1. learned counsel for petitioner submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.2. submission made by the counsel for petitioner is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.3. in view of disposal of the petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly. sd/- judge yan ct:bck list no.: 2 sl no.: 4

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO.111112 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: KARIYAPPA, HELPER, CONSTRUCTION DEPT., BENGALURU CONTONMENT, DHARWAD. … PETITIONER (BY SRI HEMANTHKUMAR L. HAVARAGI, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE GENERAL MANAGER, KARNATAKA-580020.

2. PRINCIPAL CHIEF PERSONNEL OFFICER, ASHPAK KASHIMSA KARNATAKA-580020. … RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2024.06.28 13:27:05 +0530

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT MANDAMUS DIRECTING TO THE RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION TO OBSERVE AND IMPLEMENT THE RULING AS A WHOLE TO ALL THE RAILWAY SERVANTS AND FOR SOME SELECTED PEOPLE WHO HAVE APPROACHED THE COURT OF LAW AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: -2-

ORDER

1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.

2. Submission made by the counsel for petitioner is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

3. In view of disposal of the petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE YAN CT:BCK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial