Ratheesh vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 31, 2020

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1798001

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1798001
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Ashok Menon
Decided On: Jan 31, 2020
Case Number: Crl.MC/4383/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ratheesh

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....post, by adv. smt.mereena j joseph respondents/complainant & de-facto complainant:1 state of kerala, represented by the station house,officer, njarakkal police station, through public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam 2 jemshid, aged 32 years, son of jaleel, thoppil thannipadam, mannam post, paravur, mannam-683 520 r2 by adv. denizen komath other present: sri.b.jayasurya - sr. public prosecutor this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 31.01.2020, the court on the same day passed the following:orderdat hist he31stdayofj anuary,2020 the pet iti sar e accused i n c. 2017 on t he fil es of t udi cial fi str t, nj ,for havi ng al legedl y commi tted of fencespuni shabl e undersect ions143,144,147, 148,341,323,324,294( b)and 427 r ead wi th sect ion 149 oft pc. the onl y def act o compl ainant -inj ured i sthe 2nd r espondent who has appear hrough counsel and fil ed af fidavi he ef fect t hat t he mat terhasbeen ami cabl y set tled wi tht he pet iti sand t hathe has no gr ievance agai nst t hem. a r epor hat ef fect has al so been obt ained f rom t nvest igat ing of ficer . the pet iti s do nothave anycr imi nalant ecedent s.ther eisnopubl ici nter esti nvol ved. i n t he r esul t,t he cr l.m. c i s al lowed and t he ent ire pr oceedi ngsasagai nstt hepet iti sinc. 2017ont hefil esof t udi cialfi str t,nj ,st ands quashed undersect ion482cr .p. c andt heaccusedar edi schar ged. sd/- ashok m enon judge nr/ 31/ 01/ appendix petitioners' exhibits: annexure-a1 true certified copy of the fir in crime no.761/17 of 1st respondent police station annexure-a2 the affidavit executed by 2nd respondent respondents' exhibits: nil //true copy// pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 11TH MAGHA, 1941 C.C.NO.914/2017 ON THE FILE OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, NJARAKKAL U/S 143, 144, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 294(B),

427 R/W 149 IPC PETITIONERS/ACCUSED: 1 RATHEESH, AGED 36 YEARS, SON OF THANKAPPAN, PULICKAL HOUSE, PUTHUVYPU POST, KOCHI- 682 508 2 VANIL, AGED 30 YEARS, SON OF WALTER, MOONUTHENGUNGAL HOUSE, PUTHUVYPU POST, 3 JOSHI, AGED 49 YEARS, SON OF JOSEPH, KANNAYATH HOUSE, PUTHUVYPU POST, 4 SUMESHLAL, AGED 37 YEARS, SON OF SURESH, PARUTHIYEZHATH HOUSE, PUTHUVYPU POST, 5 VARGHESE, AGED 42 YEARS, SON OF VINCENT, KURISINGAL HOUSE, PUTHUVYPU POST, BY ADV. SMT.MEREENA J JOSEPH RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT:

1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE STATION HOUSE,OFFICER, NJARAKKAL POLICE STATION, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 2 JEMSHID, AGED 32 YEARS, SON OF JALEEL, THOPPIL THANNIPADAM, MANNAM POST, PARAVUR, MANNAM-683 520 R2 BY ADV. DENIZEN KOMATH OTHER PRESENT: SRI.B.JAYASURYA - SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dat hist he31stdayofJ anuary,2020 The pet iti sar e accused i n C. 2017 on t he fil es of t udi cial Fi str t, Nj ,for havi ng al legedl y commi tted of fencespuni shabl e underSect ions143,144,147, 148,341,323,324,294( b)and 427 r ead wi th Sect ion 149 oft PC. The onl y def act o compl ainant -inj ured i sthe 2nd r espondent who has appear hrough counsel and fil ed af fidavi he ef fect t hat t he mat terhasbeen ami cabl y set tled wi tht he pet iti sand t hathe has no gr ievance agai nst t hem. A r epor hat ef fect has al so been obt ained f rom t nvest igat ing Of ficer . The pet iti s do nothave anycr imi nalant ecedent s.Ther eisnopubl ici nter esti nvol ved. I n t he r esul t,t he Cr l.M. C i s al lowed and t he ent ire pr oceedi ngsasagai nstt hepet iti sinC. 2017ont hefil esof t udi cialFi str t,Nj ,st ands quashed underSect ion482Cr .P. C andt heaccusedar edi schar ged. Sd/- ASHOK M ENON JUDGE NR/ 31/ 01/ APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE-A1 TRUE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.761/17 OF 1ST RESPONDENT POLICE STATION ANNEXURE-A2 THE AFFIDAVIT EXECUTED BY 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2020 Same Parties Ratheesh vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Ashok Menon