Divya Devendra Kyalakond, vs the State of Karnataka,

Divya Devendra Kyalakond, vs The State of Karnataka,

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Nov 28, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1797481

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1797481
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Pradeep Singh Yerur
Decided On: Nov 28, 2024
Case Number: WP/106852/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Divya Devendra Kyalakond,

Respondent

The State of Karnataka,

Excerpt

.....officer, department of social welfare and member of selection committee of9. the child development project officer, hangal and member of selection committee of10. smt. basamma basappa shelwanth, aged about 26 years, …respondents this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ in thenature of certiorari by quashing the impugned orderbearing no.uniha/mmae/amsa/gu/2018-19/755 dated 14.12.2018 in so far as it relates to sl.no.1 pertaining to bommanahalli-4 issued by the respondent no.5, as arbitrary, illegal and void and one offending art 14 and 16 of the constitution of india. this petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following: -3-oral order(per: the hon'ble mr. justice pradeep singh yerur)1. it is seen that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.2. sufficient time is granted to the petitioner torectify the objections. however, till date, objections are not rectified. even on the previous two hearing dates, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.3. on the last date of hearing, i.e., on 11.11.2024,this court granted one week time to rectify the objection, failing which to list this matter for dismissal by providing one more opportunity. however, even today, there is no representation and objections are not rectified.4. under the circumstances, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in this matter.5. petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- (pradeep singh yerur) judge kgk ct-mck list no.: 1 sl no.: 48

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 106852 OF 2019 (S-RES) BETWEEN: DIVYA DEVENDRA KYALAKOND, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ARAVIND D. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN WELFARE, M.S. BUILDING, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH
3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, Location: HIGH COURT OF THE ZILLA PANCHAYATH, KARNATAKA DHARWAD HAVERI, DIST: HAVERI. BENCH
4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, CHILD DEVELOPMENT,
5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND MEMBER OF SELECTION COMMITTEE OF ANGANNAWADI WORKER/ASSISTANT, -2-
6. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYAT AND MEMBER
7. THE TALUKA HEALTH OFFICER AND MEMBER,
8. THE TALUKA SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND MEMBER OF SELECTION COMMITTEE OF
9. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, HANGAL AND MEMBER OF SELECTION COMMITTEE OF
10. SMT. BASAMMA BASAPPA SHELWANTH, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE

NATURE OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER

BEARING NO.UNIHA/MMAE/AMSA/GU/2018-19/755 DATED 14.12.2018 IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO SL.NO.1 PERTAINING TO BOMMANAHALLI-4 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.5, AS ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL AND VOID AND ONE OFFENDING ART 14 AND 16 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: -3-

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR)

1. It is seen that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Sufficient time is granted to the petitioner to

rectify the objections. However, till date, objections are not rectified. Even on the previous two hearing dates, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

3. On the last date of hearing, i.e., on 11.11.2024,

this Court granted one week time to rectify the objection, failing which to list this matter for dismissal by providing one more opportunity. However, even today, there is no representation and objections are not rectified.

4. Under the circumstances, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in this matter.

5. Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE KGK CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties Divya Devendra Kyalakond, vs The State of Karnataka, Same Judge Pradeep Singh Yerur