P Manjunath vs the State of Karnataka

P Manjunath vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Feb 01, 2024

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1796444

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1796444
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Hemant Chandangoudar
Decided On: Feb 01, 2024
Case Number: WP/100192/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P Manjunath

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....against the petitioner by the respondent no.3 by issuing notice dated 02/01/2024 and fixing the date of no-confidence motion on 13/01/2024 vide annexure-b.this petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following: -3- this petition is filed challenging the notice dated 02.01.2024 issued by the respondent no.3 fixing the date of no confidence motion on 13.01.2024.2. heard the learned counsel for the parties.3. sub clause (4) of the rule 14-akk of the karnataka co-operative societies rules, 1960, mandates that the authorized officer shall give a notice of not less than fifteen clear days of such meeting to all elected members of the board. in the instant case, only thirteen days is provided convening the meeting for moving the no confidence motion against the petitioner which is in violation of sub clause (4) of rule 14-akk of the rules, 1960. therefore, the impugned notice which is issued by the respondent no.3 is contrary to the said rule, and not sustainable in law. accordingly, i pass the following:(i) writ petition is allowed.(ii) the impugned notice dated 02.01.2024 issued by the respondent no.3 at annexure - b is hereby quashed.(iii) liberty is reserved with the members of the board of therespondent no.4 - society to move a fresh no -4- confidence motion against the petitioner, if so advised, in accordance with law. sd/- judge rsh / ct: gsm. list no.: 1 sl no.: 6

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 100192 OF 2024 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: P. MANJUNATH S/O. VIRUPAKSHAGOUDA, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. U. BEVINAHALLI, POTALAKATTE POST TQ. HARAPANAHALLI-583125 DIST. VIJAYANAGAR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.S.BETURMATH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU- 560 001
2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES HARAPANAHALLI SUB-DIVISION HARAPANAHALLI-583131.
3. AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, THE PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL
SUJATA                        CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.
SUBHASH                       UCHCHANGIDURGA TQ. HARAPANAHALLI-583125.
PAMMAR                        DIST: VIJAYANAGAR.
Digitally signed by
SUJATA SUBHASH        4.      THE PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT
PAMMAR                        CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. UCHCHANGIDURGA
Date: 2024.02.02              TQ. HARAPANAHALLI-583 125
21:31:56 -0800 DIST: VIJAYANAGAR BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
5. T. MANJAPPA S/O HANAMATAPPA,
6. SAYYEDRIYAZ S/O MOHAMMED HANEEFSAB, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, -2-
7. M. KARADEPPA S/O KENCHAHANAMAPPA, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
8. K. NAGARAJ S/O MARULASIDDANAGOUDA
9. SMT. PRAMEELADEVI W/O VAMDEVAPPA AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
10. KHANDERAO S/O K. HANAMATRAO R/O. UCHCHANGIDURGA, TQ. HARAPANAHALLI- 583125.
11. NEELANAYAK S/O CHANDRA NAIK R/O.RAMANAGATTADODDATANDA TQ. HARAPANAHALLI- 583125. DIST: VIJAYANAGAR.
12. SMT. H. NANDINI W/O H. JAYAPPA
AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.S.KALASURMATH, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2, SRI.IRANAGOUDA K. KABBUR, ADV. FOR R5 TO R10 AND R12) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION TO QUASH ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS OF INITIATION OF NO-CONFIDENCE MOTION MOVED AGAINST THE PETITIONER BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 BY ISSUING NOTICE DATED 02/01/2024 AND FIXING THE DATE OF NO-CONFIDENCE MOTION ON 13/01/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-B.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: -3- This petition is filed challenging the notice dated 02.01.2024 issued by the respondent No.3 fixing the date of No Confidence Motion on 13.01.2024.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. Sub clause (4) of the Rule 14-AKK of the Karnataka Co-

operative Societies Rules, 1960, mandates that the Authorized Officer shall give a notice of not less than fifteen clear days of such meeting to all elected members of the Board. In the instant case, only thirteen days is provided convening the meeting for moving the No Confidence Motion against the petitioner which is in violation of sub clause (4) of Rule 14-AKK of the Rules, 1960. Therefore, the impugned notice which is issued by the respondent No.3 is contrary to the said Rule, and not sustainable in law. Accordingly, I pass the following:

(i) Writ petition is allowed.

(ii) The impugned notice dated 02.01.2024 issued by the respondent No.3 at annexure - B is hereby quashed.

(iii) Liberty is reserved with the members of the Board of the

respondent No.4 - Society to move a fresh No -4- Confidence Motion against the petitioner, if so advised, in accordance with law. Sd/- JUDGE RSH / CT: GSM. LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 6

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties P Manjunath vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge Hemant Chandangoudar