Abdul Salam vs Nooshath Bee

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 28, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1795166

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1795166
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mrs Justice R. Hemalatha
Decided On: Feb 28, 2025
Case Number: SA/423/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abdul Salam

Respondent

Nooshath Bee

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 28.02.2025coram:the honourable mrs. justice r. hemalatha s.a.no.423 of 20181. abdul salam2. rahamathbi ... appellants vs. nooshath bee ...respondent s.a.no.430 of 2018 abdul salam ... appellant vs.1. nooshath bee2. sheik abdullah sahib ...respondentscommon prayer: second appeals filed under section 100 of civil procedure code against the decree and judgment dated 15.02.2018 in a.s.16/2014 & a.s.no.5/2017 on the file of the i additional district judge, tindivanam confirming the decree and judgment dated 07.01.2013 in o.s.no.380 of 2010 & o.s.nos.383/2010 on the file of the principal district munsif, tindivanam respectively.in both cases for appellant : no appearance for respondents : no appearancer. hemalatha, j.vumcommon judgmenttoday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the appellants and the respondents in both the appeals.2. the second appeals are of the year 2018 and they have notbeen admitted so far. it is seen from the records that on several hearings, the second appeals have been adjourned at the instance of the counsel for the appellants.3. hence, the second appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. no costs. 28.02.2025 vum index : yes/nospeaking / non-speaking orderneutral citation : yes / no to1. the i additional district judge, tindivanam.2. the principal district munsif, tindivanam.3. the section officer, vr section, high court, madras.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.02.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.No.423 of 2018

1. Abdul Salam

2. Rahamathbi ... Appellants vs. Nooshath Bee ...Respondent S.A.No.430 of 2018 Abdul Salam ... Appellant vs.

1. Nooshath Bee

2. Sheik Abdullah Sahib ...Respondents

Common Prayer: Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and Judgment dated 15.02.2018 in A.S.16/2014 & A.S.No.5/2017 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Tindivanam confirming the decree and Judgment dated 07.01.2013 in O.S.No.380 of 2010 & O.S.Nos.383/2010 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam respectively.

in both cases For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance

R. HEMALATHA, J.

vum

COMMON JUDGMENT

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the appellants and the Respondents in both the appeals.

2. The second appeals are of the year 2018 and they have not

been admitted so far. It is seen from the records that on several hearings, the second appeals have been adjourned at the instance of the counsel for the appellants.

3. Hence, the Second Appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. 28.02.2025 vum Index : Yes/No

Speaking / Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation : Yes / No To

1. The I Additional District Judge, Tindivanam.

2. The Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Abdul Salam vs Nooshath Bee Same Judge Honourable Mrs Justice R. Hemalatha