Mr. E. Adithya vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Dec 30, 2025

~4 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1793670

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1793670
Court: Karnataka High Court
Judge: Anant Ramanath Hegde
Decided On: Dec 30, 2025
Case Number: CRL.P/17214/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr. E. Adithya

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....both parties. criminal petition no.6263/2025 criminal petition no.15001/2025 criminal petition no.11014/2024 -4-5. it is submitted that the aforementioned cases are disposed of by accepting the settlement arrived at between the parties though the offence alleged is under section 376 of the indian penal code.6. the court has made enquiry with the parties who are present before the court.7. the complainant/respondent no.2 submits that she has voluntarily entered into settlement.8. after going through the affidavit filed by theparties, the court is of the view that complainant and the petitioners have entered into settlement and they do not intend to prosecute the matter any further. it is also noticed that the charge sheet is not yet filed.9. under these circumstances accepting the submissions and based on the ratio laid down in the aforementioned cases, following order is passed: -5-order(i) the application is allowed, consequently the criminal petition is allowed.(ii) fir/complaint in crime no.0334/2025 registered on 01.09.2025 before annapurneshwari nagara police station, bengaluru is quashed.(iii) in case the investigating agency has recovered anything from the complainant or the accused, the same shall be released after due identification.(iv) bail bond if any executed stands cancelled. sd/- (anant ramanath hegde) judge brn list no.: 1 sl no.: 6

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17214 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1. MR. E. ADITHYA,
S/O K. ESHWARAPPA,AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/A NO.17, 2ND CROSS, ANDRAHALLI MAIN ROAD, MAYURA NAGARA, HEGGANAHALLI, PEENYA 2ND STAGE,BANGALORE NORTH, VISHWANEEDAM, BANGALORE-560091.
2. SMT. JAYALAKSHMI
W/O. K. ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/A NO.17, 2ND CROSS,ANDRAHALLI MAIN ROAD, NEAR CHANDRAGIRI BAR, MAYURA NAGAR, PEENYA 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU 560091. …PETITIONERS Digitally (BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA C H.,ADVOCATE) signed by C HONNUR SAB AND: Location: HIGH 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA COURT OF BY JNANABHARATHI POLICE STATION KARNATAKA NOW BY ANNAPORNESHWARI NAGAR P.S. REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001.
2. MS. MONISHA RAM
D/O RAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,R/AT NO. 670, 5TH CROSS, BALAJI LAYOUT, BENGALURU 560056 -2- …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT WAHEEDA M M, HCGP FOR R.1, SRI CHANDAN B K, ADVOCATE FOR R.2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR AND CONSEQUENT INVESTIGATION IN CR.NO.334/2025 REGISTERED ON 01.09.2025 BY ANNAPORNESHWARI NAGAR P.S. FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S. 69, 88, 115(2), 351(2) FO BNS, AGAINST THE PETITIONERS, WHICH IS NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE VI ADDL. CMM, BENGALURU CITY, AGAINST THE PETITIONERS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE

ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed to quash the FIR and consequent investigation in Crime No.0334/2025 registered on 01.09.2025 before Annapurneshwari Nagara Police Station, Bengaluru for the offences punishable under Sections 69, 88, 115(2), 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and to quash the proceeding before the VI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru. -3-

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is present, learned respondent No.2 is present and learned High Court Government Pleader is present.

3. The petitioners have filed an application in I.A.No.1/2025 for compounding the offence. The application is accompanied by joint affidavits filed by petitioners No.1 and 2 and respondent No. 2.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent No.2 would also place reliance on the following judgments of the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court:

(i) Sri.Ruthwik Chandra M vs. State of Karnataka and Another1

(ii) Akki Lakshmi Reddy vs. State of Karnataka and Another2

(iii) Mr.Fakirappa Hatti vs. State of Karnataka and

Another3 and would submit that the case of this nature can be compounded with the consent of both parties. Criminal Petition No.6263/2025 Criminal Petition no.15001/2025 Criminal Petition No.11014/2024 -4-

5. It is submitted that the aforementioned cases are disposed of by accepting the settlement arrived at between the parties though the offence alleged is under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

6. The Court has made enquiry with the parties who are present before the Court.

7. The complainant/respondent No.2 submits that she has voluntarily entered into settlement.

8. After going through the affidavit filed by the

parties, the Court is of the view that complainant and the petitioners have entered into settlement and they do not intend to prosecute the matter any further. It is also noticed that the charge sheet is not yet filed.

9. Under these circumstances accepting the submissions and based on the ratio laid down in the aforementioned cases, following order is passed: -5-

ORDER

(i) The application is allowed, consequently the Criminal Petition is allowed.

(ii) FIR/complaint in Crime No.0334/2025 registered on 01.09.2025 before Annapurneshwari Nagara Police Station, Bengaluru is quashed.

(iii) In case the Investigating Agency has recovered anything from the complainant or the accused, the same shall be released after due identification.

(iv) Bail bond if any executed stands cancelled. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE brn List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6

Same Court & Year Karnataka · 2025 Same Parties Mr. E. Adithya vs State of Karnataka Same Judge Anant Ramanath Hegde