Siddiq vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Dec 01, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1792391

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1792391
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Decided On: Dec 01, 2025
Case Number: CRL.P/16270/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Siddiq

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 1st day of december, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice shivashankar amarannavar criminal petition no. 16270 of 2025 (439(cr.pc) / 483(bnss)-) between:1. siddiq s/o chand pasha aged about 23 years, residing at no. 180, 1st main 10th cross, bandegudisalu valmiki nagar bengaluru-560 026…petitioner (by sri. naushad pasha.,advocate) and: digitally signed by 1. state of karnataka lakshminarayana murthy rajashri by commecial street p. s location: high bangaluru-560 0 court of karnataka represented by s.p.p high court of karnataka high court building bangalore-560 001 …respondent (by smt.b pushpalatha, addl. spp) -2- this crl.p is filed under section 439 cr.p.c (u/s483 bnss) praying to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail in cr.no.126/2025 of commercial street p.s., for the offences punishable under sections 137(2), 143(4) read with 3(5) of bns act, 2023, pending on the file of 10th additional chief judicial magistrate, mayo hall, at bengaluru. this petition, coming on for final hearing, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice shivashankar amarannavaroral orderthe learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. memo reads thus: "the petitioner above named most respectfully prays that this hon'ble court be permit him to withdraw the petition as not pressed, in the interest of justice." in view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- (shivashankar amarannavar) judge bkm list no.: 1 sl no.: 1

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 16270 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)-) BETWEEN:
1. SIDDIQ S/O CHAND PASHA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 180, 1ST MAIN 10TH CROSS, BANDEGUDISALU VALMIKI NAGAR BENGALURU-560 026

…PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAUSHAD PASHA.,ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed by 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI BY COMMECIAL STREET P. S Location: HIGH BANGALURU-560 0 COURT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY S.P.P HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001 …RESPONDENT (BY Smt.B PUSHPALATHA, ADDL. SPP) -2- THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C (U/S

483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON REGULAR BAIL IN CR.NO.126/2025 OF COMMERCIAL STREET P.S., FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 137(2), 143(4) READ WITH 3(5) OF BNS ACT, 2023, PENDING ON THE FILE OF 10th ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MAYO HALL, AT BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

ORAL ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. Memo reads thus: "The petitioner above named most respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court be permit him to withdraw the petition as not pressed, in the interest of justice." In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Siddiq vs State of Karnataka Same Judge Shivashankar Amarannavar

In the interest of high court