E.Sridhar vs Chitra

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 29, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1791402

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1791402
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan
Decided On: Apr 29, 2025
Case Number: CRL MP/4925/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

E.Sridhar

Respondent

Chitra

Excerpt

.....2022 on the file of the family court at tiruvallur. for appellant(s): mr.v.sithannan for respondent(s): mr.c.arivazhaganorderthe respondents herein filed a petition under section 125 cr.p.c., seeking maintenance, in m.c.no.30 of 2022 on the file of thefamily cout, tiruvallur. the learned judge, family court vide orderdated 24.07.2023 ordered maintenance. subsequently, the respondents have filed the cmp no.29 of 2024, seeking recovery of arrears of amount, before the family court and the learned judge, family court passed the impugned order dated 03.07.2024. the petitioner/husband has not challenged the order passed in m.c.no.30 of 2022, whereas he has challenged the impugned order dated 03.07.2024 passed in cmp no.29 of 2024 in m.c.no.30 of 2022.2. the petitioner has filed this criminal miscellaneous petitionseeking to condone the delay of 131 days in filing the criminal revision petition challenging the order dated 03.07.2024 passed in cmp no.29 of 2024 in m.c.no.30 of 2022 on the file of the family court at tiruvallur.3. considering the submission made by the learned counsel oneither side and also the nature of litigation, the delay is condoned, subject to condition that the petitioner shall deposit 50% of the arrears of maintenance to the credit of m.c.no.30 of 2022, on or before 30.05.2025, before the family court, at thiruvallur, failing which, this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without any further reference to this court.4. if the petitioner deposits 50% of arrears of maintenancebefore the trial court, he is directed to file a memo with regard to the same, before the registry. on filing of such memo, registry is directed take the revision on file, if it is otherwise in order.5. list the matter on 04.06.2025, for reporting compliance. mfa note:registry is directed to take the revision on file, if it is otherwise inorder.to the family court at tiruvallur. p. velmurugan,j mfa in

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.04.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN in E.Sridhar Petitioner Vs
1. Chithra
2. Minor S.Liyashree
3. Minor S.Lakshitha
Minor respondents 2 and 3 are represented by their Mother Chithra Respondents PRAYER: This petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation act, to condone the delay of 131 days in filing the criminal revision petition as against the order dated 03.07.2024 passed in CMP No.29 of 2024 in M.C.No.30 of 2022 on the file of the Family Court at Tiruvallur. For Appellant(s): Mr.V.Sithannan For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Arivazhagan

ORDER

The respondents herein filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., seeking maintenance, in M.C.No.30 of 2022 on the file of the

Family Cout, Tiruvallur. The learned Judge, Family Court vide order

dated 24.07.2023 ordered maintenance. Subsequently, the respondents have filed the CMP No.29 of 2024, seeking recovery of arrears of amount, before the Family Court and the learned Judge, Family Court passed the impugned order dated 03.07.2024. The petitioner/husband has not challenged the order passed in M.C.No.30 of 2022, whereas he has challenged the impugned order dated 03.07.2024 passed in CMP No.29 of 2024 in M.C.No.30 of 2022.

2. The petitioner has filed this criminal miscellaneous petition

seeking to condone the delay of 131 days in filing the criminal revision petition challenging the order dated 03.07.2024 passed in CMP No.29 of 2024 in M.C.No.30 of 2022 on the file of the Family Court at Tiruvallur.

3. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel on

either side and also the nature of litigation, the delay is condoned, subject to condition that the petitioner shall deposit 50% of the arrears of maintenance to the credit of M.C.No.30 of 2022, on or before 30.05.2025, before the Family Court, at Thiruvallur, failing which, this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without any further reference to this Court.

4. If the petitioner deposits 50% of arrears of maintenance

before the trial court, he is directed to file a memo with regard to the same, before the Registry. On filing of such memo, Registry is directed take the revision on file, if it is otherwise in order.

5. List the matter on 04.06.2025, for reporting compliance. mfa Note:Registry is directed to take the revision on file, if it is otherwise in

order.

To The Family Court at Tiruvallur. P. VELMURUGAN,J mfa in

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties E.Sridhar vs Chitra Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan