Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Sri Siddaiah vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Siddaiah vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Nov 03, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1787633

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/36539/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri Siddaiah

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....573 201.3. the special landacquisition officer, h.r.p-2, hassan- 573 201. -2- …respondents (by sri. harisha a.s, aga) this wp is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to directing the respondents to consider the representation dtd 19.6.2024 vide annexure-k and to issue notifications for acquiring remaining extent of land described in the schedule below and for payment of compensation for the said lands., and etc. this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mrs. justice k.s. hemalekhaoral orderthe petitioner has approached this court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider his representation dated 19.06.2024 vide annexure-k.2. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the representation being submitted in the year -3- 2024, the respondents have neither considered it nor communicated any decision to the petitioner.3. learned addl. government advocate for the state submits that the said representation will be considered in accordance with law, within a reasonable time.4. without adverting to the merits and demerits ofthe case, the grievance of the petitioner would stand redressed, if suitable direction is issued to the respondents. accordingly, this court pass the following:order.i) the writ petition is disposed of. ii) the respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.06.2024 (annexure-k) and pass appropriate orders strictly, in accordance with law within an outer limit of eight(8) -4- weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. sd/- _____________________ justice k.s. hemalekha phm list no.: 1 sl no.: 6

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 36539 OF 2024 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: SRI SIDDAIAH S/O HIRIGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SAMMUDRAVALLI VILLAGE, VOTE HOLE POST, PALYA HOBLI, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT- 573 201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BALARAJ A C., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M TO GOVERNMENT, Location: HIGH DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, COURT OF KARNATAKA (LAND ACQUISITION DIVISION), GATE-3, 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU- 560 001.

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN- 573 201.

3. THE SPECIAL LAND

ACQUISITION OFFICER, H.R.P-2, HASSAN- 573 201. -2- …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HARISHA A.S, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD 19.6.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-K AND TO ISSUE NOTIFICATIONS FOR ACQUIRING REMAINING EXTENT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE SCHEDULE BELOW AND FOR PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION FOR THE SAID LANDS., AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

ORAL ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider his representation dated 19.06.2024 vide Annexure-K.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the representation being submitted in the year -3- 2024, the respondents have neither considered it nor communicated any decision to the petitioner.

3. Learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State submits that the said representation will be considered in accordance with law, within a reasonable time.

4. Without adverting to the merits and demerits of

the case, the grievance of the petitioner would stand redressed, if suitable direction is issued to the respondents. Accordingly, this Court pass the following:

ORDER.

i) The writ petition is disposed of. ii) The respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.06.2024 (Annexure-K) and pass appropriate orders strictly, in accordance with law within an outer limit of eight(8) -4- weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Sri Siddaiah vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge K.S. Hemalekha

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales