Kiran M vs State by

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 03, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1783093

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1783093
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: S Vishwajith Shetty
Decided On: Jul 03, 2025
Case Number: CRL.P/13069/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kiran M

Respondent

State by

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 3rd day of july, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice s vishwajith shetty criminal petition no. 13069 of 2024 between: kiran m. s/o. munilakkaiah aged about 18 years r/at billinakote village nelamangala taluk bangalore rural district - 562 111. …petitioner (by sri rangaswamy m. t., advocate) and:1. state by thyamagondlu police stationbangalore rural district rep. by public prosecutor high court complex digitally bangalore - 560 001. signed by nandini m s 2. xxx location: high court of …respondents karnataka (by smt.waheeda m. m., hcgp, for r1, notice to r2 - held sufficient v/o dtd 15.4.2025)this crl.p filed u/s.438 (filed u/s.482 bnss) cr.p.c praying to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in cr.no.145/2025 dated 15-10-2024 registered by the thymagondlu police for the offences punishable under sections 12, 8 of the protection of children from sexual offences act-2012 and under -2-sections 3(5), 351(2) of the bharathiya nyaya samhita(bns) 2023. this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice s vishwajith shettyoral orderthere is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. perusal of order sheet maintained by this office goes to show that, even on the last several dates of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. this petition under section 438 of cr.p.c. seeking anticipatory bail is filed in the month of november 2024. it appears that, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. therefore, this court has no option to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. accordingly, the petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. sd/- (s vishwajith shetty) judge hr

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13069 OF 2024 BETWEEN: KIRAN M. S/O. MUNILAKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS R/AT BILLINAKOTE VILLAGE NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 111. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RANGASWAMY M. T., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE BY THYAMAGONDLU POLICE STATION

BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT COMPLEX Digitally BANGALORE - 560 001. signed by NANDINI M S 2. XXX Location: HIGH COURT OF …RESPONDENTS KARNATAKA (BY SMT.WAHEEDA M. M., HCGP, FOR R1, NOTICE TO R2 - HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DTD 15.4.2025)

THIS CRL.P FILED U/S.438 (FILED U/S.482 BNSS) CR.P.C PRAYING TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE IN CR.NO.145/2025 DATED 15-10-2024 REGISTERED BY THE THYMAGONDLU POLICE FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 12, 8 OF THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT-2012 AND UNDER -2-

SECTIONS 3(5), 351(2) OF THE BHARATHIYA NYAYA SAMHITA

(BNS) 2023. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

ORAL ORDER

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Perusal of order sheet maintained by this office goes to show that, even on the last several dates of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail is filed in the month of November 2024. It appears that, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore, this Court has no option to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE HR

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Kiran M vs State by Same Judge S Vishwajith Shetty