Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sameera vs the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority,

Sameera vs The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 30, 2020
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1779561

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/12928/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sameera

Respondent

The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.k.jayasankaran nambiar tuesday, the 30th day of june 2020 / 9th ashadha, 1942 wp(c).no.12928 of 2020(m) petitioner/s: sameera aged 38 years w/o.nasarudheen, pottayil house, nayarangadi, vettom p.o., tirur, malappuram district. by adv. sri.saju j.vallyara respondent/s: the secretary, regional transport authority, malappuram, civil station, up hill, malappuram p.o., pin-676 505, malappuram district.other present: sr.g.p. sri.bimal k.nath this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 30.06.2020, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c).no.12928 of 2020(m) 2judgmentthe petitioner has preferred ext.p2 application before the respondents seeking replacement of a vehicle to be operated under the permit granted to him. the limited prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to the respondents to consider and pass orders on the same expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner.2. i have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned senior government pleader for the official respondent of the state. on a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and thesubmissions made across the bar, i dispose the writ petition by directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on ext.p2 application preferred by the petitioner, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. the petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of the judgment before the respondents for further action.sd/- a.k.jayasankaran nambiar judge sd wp(c).no.12928 of 2020(m) 3 appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: exhibit p1 photocopy of the regular permit issued by the respondent to the petitioner in respect of stage carriage kl-55-f 8961. exhibit p2 photocopy of the replacement application dated 16.06.2020 submitted by the petitioner before the respondent.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 9TH ASHADHA, 1942 WP(C).No.12928 OF 2020(M) PETITIONER/S: SAMEERA AGED 38 YEARS W/O.NASARUDHEEN, POTTAYIL HOUSE, NAYARANGADI, VETTOM P.O., TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA RESPONDENT/S: THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM, CIVIL STATION, UP HILL, MALAPPURAM P.O., PIN-676 505, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

OTHER PRESENT: SR.G.P. SRI.BIMAL K.NATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.06.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.12928 OF 2020(M) 2

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 application before the respondents seeking replacement of a vehicle to be operated under the permit granted to him. The limited prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to the respondents to consider and pass orders on the same expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader for the official respondent of the State. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the

submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition by directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 application preferred by the petitioner, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of the judgment before the respondents for further action.

Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE sd WP(C).No.12928 OF 2020(M) 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 PHOTOCOPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF STAGE CARRIAGE KL-55-F 8961. EXHIBIT P2 PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPLACEMENT APPLICATION DATED 16.06.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial