Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

N Kumar vs State of Karnataka

N Kumar vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Feb 27, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1775992

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/31203/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

N Kumar

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....in sy.no.47 of obalapura village, javanagondanahalli hobli, hiriyuru taluk, chitradurga district is concerned as per the details shown in the form no.57 copy of which is produced as annexure-a in the light of the government order bearing no.rd 59 lgp 2000 bengaluru dated 22.02.2003 and unique que no.rd.11 svee and raa 2003 dated 22.02.2003 copy of which is produced at annex-b and pass order for regularization of unauthorized occupation of the petitioner as per the representation dated 04.05.2024 true copy of which is produced as annexure-c and etc., this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr justice sachin shankar magadumoral orderin the present petition, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing respondent no.3 - tahsildar to place the petitioner’s application in form no.57 before respondent no.4 - land grant committee,learned aga on -3- instructions submits that upon verification of records, it has been found that the petitioner is not eligible. consequently, the petitioner’s application has now been forwarded to respondent no.2 - deputy commissioner for further action.2. in light of statement made by the learned aga,respondent no.2-deputy commissioner, on receipt of proposal, shall independently examine the records and ascertain whether the petitioner is eligible to seek regularization. in the event the order is passed against the petitioner, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner. with these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. sd/- (sachin shankar magadum) judge hdk list no.: 1 sl no.: 14

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 31203 OF 2024 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: N. KUMAR, S/O. NARAYANA NAIK, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT OBALAPURATHANDA VILLAGE, DINDAVARA POST, J.G. HALLI HOBLI, HIRIYURU TALUK, …PETITIONER (BY SMT. RATHNAMMA E, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA,

Digitally REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, signed by REVENUE DEPARTMENT, KAVYA R MULTI STORIED BUILDING, Location: High Court of BENGALURU - 560 001. Karnataka

2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, CHITRADURGA - 577 501.

3. TAHSILDAR HIRIYURU TALUK, HIRIYURU, -2-

4. COMMITTEE FOR REGULARISATION

OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY AND TAHSILDAR, HIRIYUR TALUK, …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR REGULARIZATION AND TAKE DECISION IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO 4 ACRES OF LAND IN SY.NO.47 OF OBALAPURA VILLAGE, JAVANAGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HIRIYURU TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT IS CONCERNED AS PER THE DETAILS SHOWN IN THE FORM NO.57 COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A IN THE LIGHT OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER BEARING NO.RD 59 LGP 2000 BENGALURU DATED 22.02.2003 AND UNIQUE QUE NO.RD.11 SVEE AND RAA 2003 DATED 22.02.2003 COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEX-B AND PASS ORDER FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION OF THE PETITIONER AS PER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 04.05.2024 TRUE COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-C AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

ORAL ORDER

In the present petition, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.3 - Tahsildar to place the petitioner’s application in Form No.57 before respondent No.4 - Land Grant Committee,learned AGA on -3- instructions submits that upon verification of records, it has been found that the petitioner is not eligible. Consequently, the petitioner’s application has now been forwarded to respondent No.2 - Deputy Commissioner for further action.

2. In light of statement made by the learned AGA,

respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner, on receipt of proposal, shall independently examine the records and ascertain whether the petitioner is eligible to seek regularization. In the event the order is passed against the petitioner, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial