Sarathkumar vs State Rep.by, Deputy Superintendent of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 21, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1775439

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1775439
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan
Decided On: Feb 21, 2025
Case Number: CRL MP/2955/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sarathkumar

Respondent

State Rep.by, Deputy Superintendent of Police,

Excerpt

inin the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 21-02-2025coramthe honourable mr justice sunder mohanin sarathkumar s/o. ponnusamy, village administrative officer, pallapalayam a village, perundurai taluk, erode district. residing at 7/54, thalaiyampalayam, seenapuram, perundurai taluk, erode district. appellant(s) vs state rep.by, deputy superintendent of police, vigilance and anti corruption, erode. cr.no.9/ac/2024/er respondent(s) for appellant(s): p.kannankumar n. palanikumar s. kanraj g.k.premkumar for respondent(s): mr.s.balaji government advocate (crl.side)orderthis petition has been filed to relax the condition in para no.4(b) imposed in crl.o.p.no.149 of 2025 dated 07.01.2025. page no.1 of 3 in2. learned government advocate (crl.side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly imposed by this court and the investigation is pending.3. considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of theoffence, the condition in paragraph no. 4(b) imposed on the petitioner in crl.o.p.no.149 of 2025 dated 07.01.2025 is totally relaxed. however, the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.4. accordingly, the criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered. 21-02-2025 (2/2) dk1. state rep.by, deputy superintendent of police, vigilance and anti corruption, erode. page no.2 of 3 insunder mohan, j.dk in 21.02.2025 page no.3 of 3

Full Judgment

in
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21-02-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
IN SARATHKUMAR S/o. Ponnusamy, Village Administrative Officer, Pallapalayam A Village, Perundurai Taluk, Erode District. Residing At 7/54, Thalaiyampalayam, Seenapuram, Perundurai Taluk, Erode District. Appellant(s) Vs State Rep.By, Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Vigilance And Anti Corruption, Erode. Cr.No.9/ac/2024/er Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): P.Kannankumar N. Palanikumar S. Kanraj G.K.Premkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed to relax the condition in para no.4(b) imposed in Crl.O.P.No.149 of 2025 dated 07.01.2025. Page No.1 of 3 in

2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly imposed by this Court and the investigation is pending.

3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of the

offence, the condition in paragraph no. 4(b) imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.149 of 2025 dated 07.01.2025 is totally relaxed. However, the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

4. Accordingly, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 21-02-2025 (2/2) dk

1. State Rep.By, Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Vigilance And Anti Corruption, Erode. Page No.2 of 3 in

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

dk IN 21.02.2025 Page No.3 of 3

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties Sarathkumar vs State Rep.by, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan