Sri Mohammed Gouse Peer vs the Director (Admin and Hr)

Sri Mohammed Gouse Peer vs The Director (Admin and Hr)

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Sep 01, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1774555

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1774555
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: H.T. Narendra Prasad
Decided On: Sep 01, 2025
Case Number: WP/31427/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri Mohammed Gouse Peer

Respondent

The Director (Admin and Hr)

Excerpt

.....courtof karnataka and:1. the director (admin and hr) and disciplinary authority ltd. kaveri bhavan, k.g road, banglore-560009.2. the chief engineer(e) ltd. k.r. circle, banglore-560009. -2-3. the executive engineer(elc) kptcl, tl and ss division, s.r.s peenya, bangalore-5600584. the chairman kptcl, womens grievance redressal committee, corporate offfice, cauvery bhavan, k.g. road, bangaore-560009 …respondents this wp is filed under articles 226 and 227 ofthe constitution of india praying to call for the relevant records relating to the issue of impugned order bearing no. kavipranini/b55/46086/2324, dtd 27.10.23 passed by the respondent no.1 vide annexure-j and etc. this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice h.t. narendra prasadoral order1. learned counsel for the petitioner has filed amemo dated 01.09.2025 seeking leave of this court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the appellate authority under section 18 of the kptcl employees' service (conduct) regulations, 1988.2. the memo is taken on record. -3-3. the writ petition is disposed of, reserving liberty for the petitioner to approach the appellate authority under section 18 of the kptcl employees' service (conduct) regulations, 1988.4. insofar as the limitation period is concerned, the time spent by the petitioner before this court is to be excluded. sd/- (h.t. narendra prasad) judge ha list no.: 1 sl no.: 2

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 31427 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI MOHAMMED GOUSE PEER S/O. Late. MOHAMMED GULAM HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS WORKING AS ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (E) 220 KV REVEIVING POWER STATION, SRS PEENYA, LTD., BANGALORE-560058 R/AT NO.28, 14TH CROSS, KANAKANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560032 …PETITIONER Digitally signed by (BY SRI. GIRI GOWDA C., ADVOCATE HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH SRI. NAIK VENKATRAMAN NAGAPPA, ADVOCATE) COURTOF KARNATAKA AND:
1. THE DIRECTOR (ADMIN AND HR) AND DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY LTD. KAVERI BHAVAN, K.G ROAD, BANGLORE-560009.
2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER(E) LTD. K.R. CIRCLE, BANGLORE-560009. -2-
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
(ELC) KPTCL, TL AND SS DIVISION, S.R.S PEENYA, BANGALORE-560058
4. THE CHAIRMAN KPTCL, WOMENS GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE, CORPORATE OFFFICE, CAUVERY BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BANGAORE-560009 …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RELEVANT RECORDS RELATING TO THE ISSUE OF IMPUGNED ORDER BEARING NO. KAVIPRANINI/B55/46086/2324, DTD 27.10.23 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

ORAL ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a

memo dated 01.09.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the Appellate Authority under Section 18 of the KPTCL Employees' Service (Conduct) Regulations, 1988.

2. The memo is taken on record. -3-

3. The writ petition is disposed of, reserving liberty for the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority under Section 18 of the KPTCL Employees' Service (Conduct) Regulations, 1988.

4. Insofar as the limitation period is concerned, the time spent by the petitioner before this Court is to be excluded. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE HA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Sri Mohammed Gouse Peer vs The Director (Admin and Hr) Same Judge H.T. Narendra Prasad