Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Badarudeen vs Mumthas

Badarudeen vs Mumthas

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 31, 2020
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1771434

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/478/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Badarudeen

Respondent

Mumthas

Excerpt

& mat.appeal.no.477 of 2014 against the judgment in op(g&w) 420/2006 dated 10-02-2014 of d/o.late jafar kunju, nazar mansil, 31.01.2020, along with mat.appeal.478/2014, :-2-: & mat.appeal.no.478 of 2014 against the judgment in op 617/2007 dated 10-02-2014 of d/o.late jafar kunju, nasar mansil, :-3-: & mat.appeal.no.479 of 2014 against the judgment in os 229/2006 dated 10-02-2014 of family court, kollam appellant/defendants: 1 badarudeen, aged 37 years s/o.thangal kunju, chiramel padinjattathil(chakkanattu vilayil), chingoli, 2 thangal kunju, aged 63 years s/o.abdul kareem, chiramel padinjattathil 3 laila beevi, aged 58 years w/o.thangal kunju, chiramel padinjattathil by advs. sri.p.martin jose sri.s.sreekumar (sr.) sri.sakir.k.h. respondent/plaintiff: mumthas, aged 33 years d/o.late jafar kunju, nasar manzil, kuttathuvila, vadakkevila p.o., pin - 691 010, mat.appeal.478/2014, the court on the same day delivered the :-4-: dated this the 31st day of january, 2020j u d g m e n tshaffique, j.learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the matters have already been settled and there is no necessity to proceed with the appeals on merits. hence, the appeals are dismissed as settled. all pending interlocutory applications are closed. a.m.shaffique t.v.anilkumar ami/

Full Judgment

& Mat.Appeal.No.477 OF 2014 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP(G&W) 420/2006 DATED 10-02-2014 OF D/O.LATE JAFAR KUNJU, NAZAR MANSIL, 31.01.2020, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.478/2014, :-2-: & Mat.Appeal.No.478 OF 2014 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 617/2007 DATED 10-02-2014 OF D/O.LATE JAFAR KUNJU, NASAR MANSIL, :-3-: & Mat.Appeal.No.479 OF 2014 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 229/2006 DATED 10-02-2014 OF FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM APPELLANT/DEFENDANTS: 1 BADARUDEEN, AGED 37 YEARS S/O.THANGAL KUNJU, CHIRAMEL PADINJATTATHIL(CHAKKANATTU VILAYIL), CHINGOLI, 2 THANGAL KUNJU, AGED 63 YEARS S/O.ABDUL KAREEM, CHIRAMEL PADINJATTATHIL 3 LAILA BEEVI, AGED 58 YEARS W/O.THANGAL KUNJU, CHIRAMEL PADINJATTATHIL BY ADVS. SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.S.SREEKUMAR (SR.) SRI.SAKIR.K.H. RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: MUMTHAS, AGED 33 YEARS D/O.LATE JAFAR KUNJU, NASAR MANZIL, KUTTATHUVILA, VADAKKEVILA P.O., PIN - 691 010, Mat.Appeal.478/2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE :-4-: Dated this the 31st day of January, 2020

J U D G M E N T

SHAFFIQUE, J.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the matters have already been settled and there is no necessity to proceed with the appeals on merits. Hence, the appeals are dismissed as settled. All pending interlocutory applications are closed. A.M.SHAFFIQUE T.V.ANILKUMAR ami/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial