Rabeena vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 30, 2020

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1769345

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1769345
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mrs. Justice Anu Sivaraman
Decided On: Jun 30, 2020
Case Number: WP(C)/10623/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rabeena

Respondent

Union of India

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice anu sivaraman tuesday, the 30th day of june 2020 / 9th ashadha, 1942 wp(c).no.10623 of 2020(c) petitioner: rabeena aged 20 years d/o. nazar, kalathil (h) , pallimokku, kuthanur post, alathur taluk, palakkad. by adv. sri.l.rajesh narayan respondents: 1 union of india represented by secretary, ministry of women and child development, shastri bhavan, new delhi-110 2 state of kerala, represented by the secretary, ministry of child welfare, thycaud, thiruvananthapuram-695 014 3 sub inspector of police, kuzhalmannam police station, national highway 544, dist. chandapura, kuzhalmannam, palakkad-678 702 4 director of medical education, medical college, kumarapuram rd, chalkkuzhi, thiruvananthapuram-695 0115 5 superintendent, medical college hospital, thrissur, m.g.kavu- 6 riyas, aged 28 years s/o. saleem, 16/307, parakkunnam, palakkad hpo, palakkad-678 001 r6 by adv. sri.rajesh sivaramankutty r6 by adv. sri.m.n.mathew gp princy xavier this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 30.06.2020, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe prayer in this writ petition was for permission to undergo medical termination of pregnancy. it is submitted that the petitioner herein had suffered a miscarriage and the pregnancy had to be terminated during the pendency of the writ petition. in the above view of the matter, i am of the opinion that no further orders are required in this writ petition. the writ petition is closed leaving open all the contentions of the parties. sd/- anu sivaraman judge bng/30.06.2020 appendix petitioner's exhibits: exhibit p1 true copy of the memorandum of registration of marriage dated 19.2.2020. exhibit p2 true copy of the scan report dated 18.2.2020. exhibit p3 true copy of the fir no.184/2020 dated 9.4.2020. exhibit p4 true copy of the fis.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 9TH ASHADHA, 1942 WP(C).No.10623 OF 2020(C) PETITIONER: RABEENA AGED 20 YEARS D/O. NAZAR, KALATHIL (H) , PALLIMOKKU, KUTHANUR POST, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN RESPONDENTS: 1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, SHASTRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110 2 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CHILD WELFARE, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014 3 SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUZHALMANNAM POLICE STATION, NATIONAL HIGHWAY 544, DIST. CHANDAPURA, KUZHALMANNAM, PALAKKAD-678 702 4 DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KUMARAPURAM RD, CHALKKUZHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 0115 5 SUPERINTENDENT, MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, THRISSUR, M.G.KAVU- 6 RIYAS, AGED 28 YEARS S/O. SALEEM, 16/307, PARAKKUNNAM, PALAKKAD HPO, PALAKKAD-678 001 R6 BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY R6 BY ADV. SRI.M.N.MATHEW GP PRINCY XAVIER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.06.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The prayer in this writ petition was for permission to undergo medical termination of pregnancy. It is submitted that the petitioner herein had suffered a miscarriage and the pregnancy had to be terminated during the pendency of the writ petition. In the above view of the matter, I am of the opinion that no further orders are required in this writ petition. The writ petition is closed leaving open all the contentions of the parties. Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE Bng/30.06.2020 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF REGISTRATION OF MARRIAGE DATED 19.2.2020. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SCAN REPORT DATED 18.2.2020. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO.184/2020 DATED 9.4.2020. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE FIS.

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2020 Same Parties Rabeena vs Union of India Same Judge Honourable Mrs. Justice Anu Sivaraman