Ravindran T. vs the Secretary,

Ravindran T. vs The Secretary,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 29, 2020

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1769339

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1769339
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Dr. Justice a.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar
Decided On: May 29, 2020
Case Number: WP(C)/10613/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ravindran T.

Respondent

The Secretary,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.k.jayasankaran nambiar friday, the 29th day of may 2020/8th jyaishta, 1942 w.p(c).no.10613 of 2020(b) petitioner: ravindran t. aged 42 years s/o.sankunni nair, thanikkal house, thamarakulam road, sreekrishnapuram, palakkad. by adv. sri.i.dinesh menon respondent: the secretary, regional transport authority, palakkad, office of the regional transport officer, collectorate.p.o., palakkad-678001. by sri.k.p.harish, sr. govt. pleader this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 29.05.2020, the court on the same day delivered the following: w.p.(c).no.10613/2020 :: 2 ::judgmentthe petitioner has preferred ext.p2 request before the respondent for revision of timings pertaining to the vehicle that he is operating. the limited prayer is for a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on ext.p2 request expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner.2. i have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government pleader for the respondent. on a consideration of the facts and circumstances of thecase and the submissions made across the bar, i dispose the writ petition with a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on ext.p2 request for revision of timings within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after conducting a field enquiry and also after hearing the petitioner and others likely to be affected by any orders to be passed bythe respondent. the petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of the judgment, before the respondent, for further action. sd/- a.k.jayasankaran nambiar judge prp/29/5/2020 w.p.(c).no.10613/2020 :: 3 :: appendix petitioner's exhibits: exhibit p1 true copy of the proceedings dated 16.8.2000. exhibit p2 true copy of the request dated 7.5.2020. respondents exhibits: nil. //true copy// p.s. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY 2020/8TH JYAISHTA, 1942 W.P(C).No.10613 OF 2020(B) PETITIONER: RAVINDRAN T. AGED 42 YEARS S/O.SANKUNNI NAIR, THANIKKAL HOUSE, THAMARAKULAM ROAD, SREEKRISHNAPURAM, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT: THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD, OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, COLLECTORATE.P.O., PALAKKAD-678001. BY SRI.K.P.HARISH, SR. GOVT. PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.05.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).No.10613/2020 :: 2 ::

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 request before the respondent for revision of timings pertaining to the vehicle that he is operating. The limited prayer is for a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 request expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondent. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the

case and the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 request for revision of timings within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after conducting a field enquiry and also after hearing the petitioner and others likely to be affected by any orders to be passed by

the respondent. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of the judgment, before the respondent, for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp/29/5/2020 W.P.(C).No.10613/2020 :: 3 :: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 16.8.2000. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 7.5.2020. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2020 Same Parties Ravindran T. vs The Secretary, Same Judge Honourable Dr. Justice a.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar