P.Vijayan, Vs The Commissioner,

P.Vijayan, vs The Commissioner,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jul 22, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1769274

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1769274
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala
Decided On: Jul 22, 2025
Case Number: WP/4025/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Vijayan,

Respondent

The Commissioner,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 22-07-2025coramthe honourable mrs justice n.mala and w.m.p.nos.4757 & 4758 of 2020 p.vijayan, s/o. n.pandurangan, petitioner(s) vs respondent(s) prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying for the issuance of a direction in the nature of writ of certiorarified nd chennai 600068 quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to appropriate licence fee and pass such further orders. for petitioner(s): no appearance for respondent(s): m/s.s.gopinathan, standing counselorderthis writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of certiorarified nd chennai - 600 068, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to appropriate licence fee.2. today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner.3. learned standing counsel appearing for respondents corporationsubmitted that the petitioner has paid all the reverse fee and has a licence as on date and there are no arrears or rental amounts pending against the petitioner. hence nothing survives in this writ petition for further adjudication. in view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderton.mala, j.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22-07-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE N.MALA and W.M.P.Nos.4757 & 4758 of 2020 P.Vijayan, S/o. N.Pandurangan, Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorarified nd Chennai 600068 quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to appropriate licence fee and pass such further orders. For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): M/s.S.Gopinathan, Standing Counsel

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified nd Chennai - 600 068, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to appropriate licence fee.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner.

3. Learned standing counsel appearing for respondents Corporation

submitted that the petitioner has paid all the reverse fee and has a licence as on date and there are no arrears or rental amounts pending against the petitioner. Hence nothing survives in this writ petition for further adjudication. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

N.MALA, J.

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties P.Vijayan, vs The Commissioner, Same Judge Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala