Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Murukesh vs State of Kerala

Murukesh vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jun 30, 2020
~9 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1768358

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./3202/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Murukesh

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice ashok menon tuesday, the 30th day of june 2020 / 9th ashadha, 1942 bail appl..no.3202 of 2020 crime no.581/2020 of kattoor police station, thrissur petitioner/7th accused:murukesh, aged 21 years, s/o. balan, pooppully house, edakulam desam, poomangalam village, mukundapuram taluk, thrissur district. by adv. sri.m.anil kumar respondent/complainant: 1 state of kerala, represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam. 2 station house officer, kattoor police station, thrissur, (crime no. 581/2020) represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam.r1-2 by addl.director general of prosecution other present: sri.c.k.suresh - sr.pp this bail application having come up for admission on 30.06.2020, along with bail appl..3379/2020, the court on the same day passed the following:in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice ashok menon tuesday, the 30th day of june 2020 / 9th ashadha, 1942 bail appl..no.3379 of 2020 seeking regular bail in crime no.581 of 2020 of the kattoor police station, pending before the jfcm, irinjalakuda, thrissur district petitioners/accused no.s 4 and 5: 1 vishnu, aged 25 years, s/o.unnikannan, ayyery house, karalam village, karalam.p.o, mukundapuram taluk, thrissur district. 2 vivek, aged 24 years, s/o.unnikannan, ayyery house, karalam village, karalam.p.o, mukundapuram taluk, thrissur district.by adv. sri.n.l.bitto respondent/state of kerala: 1 the state of kerala, rep by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala at ernakulam 2 sub inspector of police, kattoor police station, kattoor .p.o, thrissur district, pin-680702 r1-2 by sri.suman chakravarthy, senior govt.pleader r1-2 by addl.director general of prosecution other present: sri.c.k.suresh - sr.pp this bail application having come up for admission on 30.06.2020, along with bail appl..3202/2020, the court on the same day passed the following:com m on.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 9TH ASHADHA, 1942 Bail Appl..No.3202 OF 2020 CRIME NO.581/2020 OF KATTOOR POLICE STATION, THRISSUR PETITIONER/7th ACCUSED:

MURUKESH, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O. BALAN, POOPPULLY HOUSE, EDAKULAM DESAM, POOMANGALAM VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.ANIL KUMAR RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KATTOOR POLICE STATION, THRISSUR, (CRIME NO. 581/2020) REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

R1-2 BY ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION OTHER PRESENT: SRI.C.K.SURESH - SR.PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.06.2020, ALONG WITH Bail Appl..3379/2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 9TH ASHADHA, 1942 Bail Appl..No.3379 OF 2020 SEEKING REGULAR BAIL IN CRIME NO.581 OF 2020 OF THE KATTOOR POLICE STATION, PENDING BEFORE THE JFCM, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.S 4 AND 5: 1 VISHNU, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.UNNIKANNAN, AYYERY HOUSE, KARALAM VILLAGE, KARALAM.P.O, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2 VIVEK, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.UNNIKANNAN, AYYERY HOUSE, KARALAM VILLAGE, KARALAM.P.O, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.N.L.BITTO RESPONDENT/STATE OF KERALA: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REP BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM 2 SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTOOR POLICE STATION, KATTOOR .P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680702 R1-2 BY SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY, SENIOR GOVT.PLEADER R1-2 BY ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION OTHER PRESENT: SRI.C.K.SURESH - SR.PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.06.2020, ALONG WITH Bail Appl..3202/2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

COM M ON ORDER

Dat ed t hi he30th dayofJ st une,2020 The pet iti s i n B. A.No. 3379 of 2020 ar e accused 4 and 5,whi let he pet iti oner i n B. A.No. 3202 of 2020i sthe7thaccused,i nCr imeNo. 581of2020ofKat toor Pol ice St ati on, f or havi ng al legedl y commi tted of fences puni shabl e under Sect ions 143, 144, 147, 148, 506( ii) , 294( b),341,324,302 r ead wi th Sect ion 149 oft he I PC. Thepr ioncasei nbr iefcanbesummar izedast hus:

2. On 29. 04. 2020 atabout4. 30 PM,t iti s

al ongwi thot herco- accused,t otal li ngni nei nnumber ,wer e al lmember sofanunl awf ulassembl y,t hecommonobj ectof whi ch wast ocommi tmur deroft hedeceased i nthi scase, named Vi shnu Vahi d. They commi tted r iot ,armed wi th deadl y weapons l ike i ron r ods, dagger , st icks and i n pr ion oft he common obj ectoft he sai d assembl y, t hey wr ongf ull yrest rai ned t he deceased and hi sfr iends namel y Sumesh Si va and Ashi q and at tacked al l wi th swor ds,st icksand ot herweaponsand al sowi th hands. As ar esul toft hegr ievousi njur iessust ainedbyt hedeceased, Vi shnu Vahi d,hesuccumbed t oit .Iti sst ated t hatear lier t her ewasaCr imer egi ster ed as148 of2020,i nthesame Pol iceSt ati on,i n whi ch t hef riend oft hedeceased namel y Set hu was at tacked, and i t seems Vi shnu Vahi d had quest ioned t he accused per sonsaboutt he sai d at tack and i tisi nret ali ati ont othat ,theyhadcal ledt hedeceasedand hi sfr iendsf oracompr omi set alk,buti thadt urnedvi olent and i n pr ion of t he common obj ect of t he sai d unl awf ul assembl y, t he deceased and hi sfr iends wer e at tacked mer cil essl y. Af ter r egi ster ing t he cr ime, t he pet iti swer eal larr est edon30. 04.

2020. AccusedNo. had ear lierfil ed an appl ion f orbai ltwi ce,and bot hthe t imes,i twasdi smi ssedbyt hisCour t.

3. The7th accused i

nthi sappl ion st atest hathe i san NRI ,empl oyedi ntheGul fandhadcomehomedur ing l eaveandwassupposedt oret he23rd ofMar urnont ch,but , unf ort unat ely,hegotst ucki nthepandemi csi tuat ion,when t he fli ght s gotcancel led and was unabl etor eturn. I tis st ated t hathe had gone outt o buysome ornament alfish, when t he al leged occurr ence t ook pl ace i n hi s pr esence. Buthe di d nothave any cont ribut ion t owar dst he at tack, ar gues t earned counselSr i.M. Ani lKumar ,appear ing f he 7th accused. I ort tisst ated t hathe hasno i llwi llor ani mosi tyei thert owar dst heot heraccused ort owar dst he deceasedandhi sfr iendsandhasbeenf alsel yimpl edi n t hiscase.

4. Thel

earned counselappear ing f ort heaccused 4 and5submi tthatt heyar eyoungst ersandt heydonot have any ant ecedent sand t hey have been i mpl ed onl y wi tht he i ntend t o suppl ementt he pr ion case agai nstt heot heraccused. I tisal sost atedt her eisno speci fic over tactat tri but ed t o any oft hese pet iti s. The mai n over t act i s at tri but ed t o A1 and A3 and t her efor e,i tispr ayedt iti smayber eleased onbai l.

5. Hear

dthe l earned counselSr i.M.Ani lKumar appear ingf orA7andt heSr i.N. L.Bi tto,f orA4andA5and al sot hel earnedSeni orPubl icPr or,Sr i.Sur esh.The l earned Publ icPr orsubmi tst iti sar e al lmember sofa gang whi ch i sinvol ved i n cr imes. Even t hough,t he pet iti s as such,may not have cr imi nal ant ecedent s,t illdat e,i tis poi nted out by t earned Publ ic Pr or, Sr i.Sur esh,t he 3rd accused i hatt sa not ori ous cr imi nal who has about 14 cases r egi ster ed agai nsthi mforver yser iousof fences,and hei sthef ather oft he accused 4 and 5. Thatwoul dindi cat et he 3rd accused was cont rol li ng t he r emai ning youngst ersi nthe at tackand t hedeceased and t hei njur ed ar eal somember s of anot her cr imi nal gang, whi ch i s wai ting f or t he pet iti sto come out so t hat t hey can r etal iat e and t her efor e,t earned Publ ic Pr or st ates t hat t he r eleasi ng t he pet iti son bai l,woul d di stur bthe peace and t ranqui li ty of t he ar ea, f or i tis possi blet hat t he pet iti smaybeat tackedbyt her ivalgangi nret ali ati on.

6. Dur

ing t he pr esentpandemi csi tuat ion,i tisal so di fficul tto cont rolt hese t wo gangs,who ar e atwarwi th eachot her .Iti sther efor esubmi ttedbyt hel earnedPubl ic Pr ort iti smaynotber eleasedonbai l and t hei nvest igat ion haspr ogr essed wel land t illt he finalr epor tisfil ed,t he appl ion f orbai lfil ed by t hese pet iti sneednotbeconsi der ed.

7. Af

terhavi ng consi der ed t he ent iret yoft he f act s and ci rcumst ancesoft hiscase,Ifind t hemostoft he accused ar eyoungst ers,i ncl udi ng t iti sand t hey had al legedl yformed a gang t o at tack t he gang oft he deceased and hi sfr iends and t hey wer e al larmed up t o t hei rteet h wi th danger ousweaponsl ike st icks,kni fe and swor ds. Thi s woul d i ndi cat e t he i ntent ion of t he pet iti s. I am of t he opi nion t hat ,in case, t he pet iti s ar erel eased on bai latt his st age,t his woul d defini tel yescal atet hel ossofpubl ict ranqui li tyi nthear ea and t her eis al ways a possi bil ityt he f riends oft he deceased woul dret ali ate,causi ng a wor seni ng oft aw andor dersi tuat ioni nthel ocal ity .

8. The l

earned counselappear ing f or A4 and A5, Sr i.N. L.Bi tto, submi ts t hat mai ntai ning peace and t ranqui li ty i n t ocal ity i s t he dut y of t he Pol ice aut hor iti es and i tisf ort he Pol ice aut hor iti es t o pr event br eachofl aw andor der .Incaset her eissomer etal iat ion, i tisf ort hem t oint erf ere and do t he needf ul. Thati sno r easont odecl inebai ltot iti s. I nthepr esentpandemi csi tuat ion,i tmaynotbe possi blet o engage a f ullPol ice f orce,t o see t hat t he warr ing gangsdonotgett hemsel vesi ntoanot herconfli ct, soonaf tert iti sar erel easedonbai l. Andhence, I find t hat i tis st illt oo ear lyf or t he pet iti sto be r eleased on bai l at t his st age and t her efor e, t he appl ionsf orbai lst andsdi smi ssed. Sd/ - ASHOK M ENON JUDGE NR/30/06/20

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial