Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manojkumar vs State of Kerala

Manojkumar vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 30, 2020
~11 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1767924

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./3138/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manojkumar

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....said articles and for that reason he is also equally liable. -12-9. after having heard both sides, i find that the picuture is not as rosy as projected by the accused. the fact that kottayam district was declared as red zone was known to the 1st accused. the 2nd accused also knew where he had to transport the articles loaded inhis vehicle. the 1st accused admittedly did not have licence to stock the articles in his house at chottanikkara, and therefore, the intentions were bonafide and he should have taken delivery of the articles from m/s naaj medicals only on getting a clerance for proper transporting and storing thearticles.10. the argument of the learned counsel for the 2 ndaccused that there is no chemical examination report to confirm that the contraband articles seized is not hand sanitizer and is actually spirit, and therefore, the prosecution case has not legs to stand on. it is however pertinent to note that the bills were only for transporting and selling of 290 cans; whereas what wasfound stored was 499 cans. the stock is connected to crime registered at kalady police station, in which the -13- authorities had seized spirit being sold as imfl. the clandestine manner in which the petitioners herein had transproted the articles to chottanikkara also incidates that their intentions were not as holy as isattempted to be portrayed by the accused. true, there are certain questions to be answered by the prosecution. but they still have time, and in casethey do not within the stipulated time complete the investigation, the accused are at liberty to approach the jurisdictional court for statutory bail as provided under section 167(2) of the cr.p.c. releasing the accused at this point in time would give a wrong signal to the society.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 9TH ASHADHA, 1942 Bail Appl.No.3138 OF 2020 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN TN 255/2020 OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CMP 85/2020 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, CHOTTANIKKARA(TEMPORARY) CRIME NO.372/2020 OF CHOTTANIKKARA POLICE STATION , Ernakulam PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED: MANOJKUMAR, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O. GOPI, KUNNATHU VEETIL, CHOTTANIKKARA KARAYIL, KUREEKKADU VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI.T.K.RAJESHKUMAR SRI.T.S.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REP. BY STATION HOUSE OFFICE, CHOTTANIKKARA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

OTHER PRESENT: SMT.K.K.SHEEBA, PP FOR ADGP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12.06.2020, ALONG WITH Bail Appl.3251/2020, THE COURT ON 30.06.2020 PASSED THE FOLLOWING: -2-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 9TH ASHADHA, 1942 Bail Appl.No.3251 OF 2020 CRIME NO.372/2020 OF CHOTTANIKKARA POLICE STATION , Ernakulam PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED: ABDUL SALAM, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O. ABOOBACKER, AMMINIPARAMBIL VEETTIL, ASOKAPURAM, ALUVA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHOTTANIKKARA POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682031. SMT.K.K.SHEEBA, PP FOR ADGP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12.06.2020, ALONG WITH Bail Appl.3138/2020, THE COURT ON 30.06.2020 PASSED THE FOLLOWING: -3-

COMMON ORDER

[ Bail Appl.3138/2020, Bail Appl.3251/2020 ] Dated this the 30th day of June 2020 Applications for regular bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.

2. The petitioner in B.A.No.3138/2020 is the 1st accused and the petitioner in B.A.No.3251/2020 is the 2nd accused in Crime No.372/2020 of Chottanikkara Police Station for having allegedly committed the offence punishable under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act initially, and subsequently, under Sections 55(i) and 62 of the Act were also incorporated.

3. The prosecution case in brief is that on 29.04.2020 at about 4.55 PM the 1st accused was found to be in possession of 2495 litres of spirit stored in his house at Kureekkad Village. He was arrested on that

day and remanded to judicial custody. On 30.04.2020 the 2nd accused was arrested for the allegation that he is the person who transported the said contraband to the 1st accused in a vehicle. The contraband articles -4-

contained        499    small     cans     of    spirit       containing       five
litres each.           248 carton boxes contain two of these
cans.       Three cans were found kept separately on the
floor.       The cans had a printing “Hand Sanitizer” and
the    carton      boxes       suggested       that     it    was    produced    in

bottles by “See Bhal Mikelin Distillery Pvt.Ltd., Goa”. The police officials confirmed that it was spirit and prepared Annexure-A search list. The 1st accused mentioned that the contraband articles were sanitizers and he also produced bills/invoices indicating that the goods were delivered to him by M/s NAAJ Medicals, Companypady, Aluva. However, not being satisifed with the explanation offered by the 1st accused, the police officials proceeded with the case. The petitioner states that they are innocent and that 1st accused is a representative of M/s NAAJ Medicals, a company having a valid GST registration and deals with various medicines, drugs, including masks and hand sanitizers. In consequence to the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic,

there was huge demand for mask and sanitizer, and accordingly, they were brought under the valid licence -5- from Goa. Chemical name of hand sanitizers are “Cluo Hand Sanitizer” and “Anton Braniff Hand Sanitizer” respectively, and the components of Anton Braniff are 70% Ethanol, Glycerine, Hydrogen Peroxide and water, added with perfume; while in Cluo Hand Sanitizer, the ingredients are 70% Ethanol with Glycerine, water and colour.

4. The Government of India had issued special

order as S.O.1087/E dated 13.03.2020 by the Minitry of

Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, including “surgical masks and hand sanitizers” under

the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.                           As per the said
Notification            at   Annexure      A1     in    B.A.No.3138/2020         was
intended to prevent spread of COVID-19.                               S.O.1169(E)

dated 19.03.2020 of Government of India at Annexure A2 in the above B.A. allows production and distribution of hand sanitizers by virtue of the powers conferred under Sub-section 2A and Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act. Annexure A3 in the above B.A. is the copy of the provisional manufacturing licence No.989 dated 24.03.2020 issued by the Ministry of Food and Drug Administration, Government of Goa. -6-

5. Annexure A5 in above B.A. is a copy of the invoice in favour of M/s NAAJ Medicals for purchase of

the articles. Delivery to M/s NAAJ Medicals was made in accordance with the statutory formalities required, including payment of GST and e-Way bills (Annexure A6). The 1st accused had taken delivery of denatured spirit in the form of hand sanitizer from the master supplier M/s NAAJ Medicals and supplies it to various distributors in the local market. Due to Kottayam being declared a Red Zone, the border between Ernakulam and Kottayam was closed. Hence, the 1st accused was not in a position to supply those hand sanitizers there and temporarily unloaded the same at his residence at Chottanikkara for the sake of convenience, intending to be shifted to Kottayam District once the border was opened. It was at that time, that the police from Chottanikkara Police Station came to the residence of the petitioner and inspected the premises and misunderstood that the liquid hand sanitizer was plain spirit. In consequence of that, the Station House Officer, Chottanikkara Police Station regisered the -7-

crime.       The 1st accused was arrested and remanded to
judicial          custody        and    the      2nd    accused       driver,    who
transported         the     articles,         was      also     arrested   on    the
following         day.         Bail     application           moved    before    the
Judicial       First      Class        Magistrate         Court,    Chottanikkara

was dismissed on 06.05.2020 vide Annexure A8 in the above B.A.

6. It is submitted on behalf of the 1 st accused that Rule 8 of the Kerala Rectified Spirit Rules, 1972 allows release of rectified spirit from the distillery

without      payment        of    any    dues       for    the     manufacture    of
medicinal         and    toilet        preparations           containing   alcohol
and    the     Kerala       Abkari       Rules         also    excludes    alcohol

contended sanitizers and it does not attract under the penal provisions of Abkari Act.

7. The 2nd accused submits that he is innocent and had nothing to do with the acquiring of the spirit or sanitizer and he too has produced photocopies of the manufacturing licence to the distillery as also the copies of invoice along with way-bills. It is submitted that he was only the driver of the vehicle -8- and had the required bills/invoice to transport the

articles,       and     therefore,      his     role     is    very          limited.
However,       consequent        to     his     arrest,        he       moved        the
Judicial       First     Class    Magistrate          Court,       Chottanikkara
for    bail     and    the     same    was    rejected        by    the          learned
Magistrate vide Annexure F in B.A.No.3251/2020.                                      The

Sessions Court too dismissed the bail vide Annexure A9. The learned Sessions Judge also dismissed the application for bail vide Annexure G. It is submitted that the petitioner does not have any antecedents and that he may be released on bail.

8. In support of the prosecution story is that the contraband articles was intended to be used for manufacture of illicit arrack and IMFL, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State very vehemently opposes the granting of bail to the accused. It is pointed out that the Inspector of Police,

Chottanikkara Police Station had received a secret information that spirit was stored unauthorisedly in the house of the 1st accused and in consequence of that, he had conducted a search of the house and recovered -9-

the aforesaid quantity of spirit.                         It is admitted that
the bill of M/s NAAJ Medicals, Aluva was produced.                                  It
is    submitted        that         the    1st    accused      is    a   native     of
Chottanikkara and a taxi driver there.                               Investigation

revealed that he has no experience with the marketing

and    production        of     hand       sanitizers          or   other     medical
products.        Despite that, he had stored huge quantity of
spirit.        It is on the basis of the confession statement
given     by    the     1st    accused           that    the    name     of   the   2nd
accused,        being         the     driver        of    the       vehicle    which

transported the spirit, was revealed, in consequence of which he was arrested. It is submitted that the 6 th accused Siyad is closely associated with the 2 nd accused in transporting the spirit. The names of “Indian Roller Deluxe Rum” and “Indian Roller Deluxe Whiskey” were provided on the cartons, which was loaded into the vehicle, though the 2nd accused has noticed that, he did not question or suspect anything about the contents of the load. He also had concealed the load with plastic sheet so as to hide it from the view of the public as well as the police. The learned Public Prosecutor -10-

would further indicate that the bill in favour of the 1st accused was only for 290 cans, but what was loaded into the vehicle and delivered to him was 499 cans. The 1st accused did not questioned about the quantity in excess of the bill, which would indicate that the 1st accused as well as the 2nd accused were glove in hand

for transporting the contraband articles. During the investigation, it was revealed that Abdul Jaleel, who is the owner of M/s NAAJ Medicals is an accused in Crime No.934/2020 of Kalady Police Station and his drug licence expires on 25.11.2020. It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that sanitizers without any licence is spirit and as per the licence referred to above, the owner of M/s NAAJ Medical is only licensed to sell, store or exhibit for sale or distribution of retail drug as per Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945. It is also submitted that the bill produced by the 1st accused purportely to be that of M/s NAAJ Medicals was fake and it did not contain the licence number, which is mandatorily to be mentioned as per the Rules. The owner of M/s NAAJ Medicals has also violated the rules -11- by allegedly selling the stock to the 1st accused for

the    reason      that        he   did    not     have    the       licence    for
wholesale         as        required       under     the        Rules.         The
investigation           further        revealed     that       the   4th   accused

Regikumar is a notorious criminal and is involved in several abkari cases and he is acqainted with the 1st accused and that is how they hatched the conpsiracy to transport spirit under the guise of it being hand sanitizer. In Crime No.934/2020 of Kalady Police Station, it is revealed that the accused persons there had used the very same spirit as liquor and sell it for human consmption as IMFL. It is the very same product, which was seized from Chottanikkara in the instant cae from the 1st accused, the stickers of the can were also similar. From these, what could be deduced was that the actual motive of the 1st accused was to distribute spirit as IMFL or illicit arrack under the guise of it being hand sanitizers. The 2nd accused had knowingly transproted the said articles and for that reason he is also equally liable. -12-

9. After having heard both sides, I find that the picuture is not as rosy as projected by the accused. The fact that Kottayam District was declared as Red Zone was known to the 1st accused. The 2nd accused also knew where he had to transport the articles loaded in

his vehicle.           The 1st accused admittedly did not have
licence       to     stock       the    articles     in     his     house     at
Chottanikkara,           and      therefore,       the    intentions        were
bonafide       and    he       should   have     taken    delivery    of    the
articles       from     M/s      NAAJ   Medicals     only      on   getting   a
clerance       for     proper       transporting         and    storing     the

articles.

10. The argument of the learned Counsel for the 2 nd

accused that there is no chemical examination report to confirm that the contraband articles seized is not hand sanitizer and is actually spirit, and therefore, the prosecution case has not legs to stand on. It is however pertinent to note that the bills were only for transporting and selling of 290 cans; whereas what was

found stored was 499 cans. The stock is connected to crime registered at Kalady Police Station, in which the -13- authorities had seized spirit being sold as IMFL. The clandestine manner in which the petitioners herein had transproted the articles to Chottanikkara also incidates that their intentions were not as holy as is

attempted to be portrayed by the accused.                      True, there
are     certain         questions       to     be    answered     by   the
prosecution.           But they still have time, and in case

they do not within the stipulated time complete the investigation, the accused are at liberty to approach the jurisdictional Court for statutory bail as provided under Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C. Releasing the accused at this point in time would give a wrong signal to the society at large, which needs to be protected from the illicit liquor which flows in hampering the health of the common man. I am therefore, of the view that the bail applications need to be dismised and I do so. Sd/- dkr ASHOK MENON JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial