Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Marry Jacob vs Ambros,

Marry Jacob vs Ambros,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 31, 2020
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1766966

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/730/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Marry Jacob

Respondent

Ambros,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice anu sivaraman friday, the 31st day of january 2020 / 11th magha, 1941 con.case(c).no.730 of 2019 in wp(c). 5381/2018 against the order/judgment in wp(c) 5381/2018(w) of high court of kerala petitioner: marry jacob aged 59 years w/o. jacob, mayyattil house, pps road, narakkal, ernakulam 682 505 by advs. sri.m.p.sreekrishnan sri.a.muhammed musthafa respondent: ambros, age not known to the petitioner, fathers name not known to the petitioner,tahsildar, kochi, office of the revenue divisional officer, fort kochi 682 001. r1 by government pleader gp. smt. deepa narayan this contempt of court case (civil) having been finally heard on 31.01.2020, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 31st day of january 2020 the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the directions of this court have been complied with by the respondent. this contempt of court case is accordingly closed. sd/- anu sivaraman judge svp appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: annexure a a certified copy of the judgment , dated 19-09-2018 in wp(c) 5381 of 2018 annexure b a true copy of the communication, dated 29-10-2018

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 11TH MAGHA, 1941 Con.Case(C).No.730 OF 2019 IN WP(C). 5381/2018 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 5381/2018(W) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER: MARRY JACOB AGED 59 YEARS W/O. JACOB, MAYYATTIL HOUSE, PPS ROAD, NARAKKAL, ERNAKULAM 682 505 BY ADVS. SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN SRI.A.MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA RESPONDENT: AMBROS, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,TAHSILDAR, KOCHI, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI 682 001. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER GP. SMT. DEEPA NARAYAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 31st day of January 2020 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the directions of this Court have been complied with by the respondent. This Contempt of Court Case is accordingly closed. Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE SVP APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT , DATED 19-09-2018 IN WP(C) 5381 OF 2018 ANNEXURE B A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION, DATED 29-10-2018

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial