Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sri K Dasharath vs Vasantha Devadas

Sri K Dasharath vs Vasantha Devadas

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Jul 01, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1766828

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MFA/6558/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri K Dasharath

Respondent

Vasantha Devadas

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 1st day of july, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice ramachandra d. huddar miscellaneous first appeal no. 6558 of 2024 (cpc) between:1. sri. k.dasharaths/o late n.krishnappa aged about 49 years r/at no.30, 'lawyer layout' hommadevanahalli, begur hobli bannerghatta main road bengaluru-560 083. …appellant (sri. k.dasharath [party-in-person]) and:1. vasantha devadas w/o k.devadas aged about 60 years digitally signed by shakambari n.s.palya, btm ii stage location: high bengaluru-560 076. court of karnataka2. sri. k.devadas s/o late p.kaverappa aged about 66 years n.s.palya, btm ii stage bengaluru-560 076. …respondents (by sri. v.vishwanath setty, advocate for c/r1 & c/r2) this mfa filed under order xliii rule 1(r) of the cpc, praying to set aside the order dated 03.09.2024 -2-in o.s.no.1450/2024 on the file of the iv additional senior civil judge, bengaluru rural district, bengaluru, thereby allowing the application preferred by the appellant for injunction. this appeal, coming on for orders, this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice ramachandra d. huddaroral judgmentthe appellant/party-in-person has filed a memo dated 22.02.2025, which reads as under: "the appellant named above in the aforesaid case most humbly and respectfully prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the above appeal as not pressed. hence this memo."2. the said memo is placed on record.3. in view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- (ramachandra d. huddar) judge pgg/list no.: 1 sl no.: 7

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6558 OF 2024 (CPC) BETWEEN:

1. SRI. K.DASHARATH

S/O LATE N.KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO.30, 'LAWYER LAYOUT' HOMMADEVANAHALLI, BEGUR HOBLI BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD BENGALURU-560 083. …APPELLANT (SRI. K.DASHARATH [PARTY-IN-PERSON]) AND:

1. VASANTHA DEVADAS W/O K.DEVADAS AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS Digitally signed by SHAKAMBARI N.S.PALYA, BTM II STAGE Location: High BENGALURU-560 076. Court of Karnataka

2. SRI. K.DEVADAS S/O LATE P.KAVERAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS N.S.PALYA, BTM II STAGE BENGALURU-560 076. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.VISHWANATH SETTY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 & C/R2) THIS MFA FILED UNDER ORDER XLIII RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 03.09.2024 -2-

IN O.S.NO.1450/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, THEREBY ALLOWING THE APPLICATION PREFERRED BY THE APPELLANT FOR INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR

ORAL JUDGMENT

The appellant/party-in-person has filed a memo dated 22.02.2025, which reads as under: "The appellant named above in the aforesaid case most humbly and respectfully prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the above appeal as not pressed. Hence this memo."

2. The said memo is placed on record.

3. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE PGG/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial