Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Emmanuel Antony vs State of Kerala

Emmanuel Antony vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 29, 2020
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1766641

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./2951/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Emmanuel Antony

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice ashok menon friday, the 29th day of may 2020 / 8th jyaishta, 1942 crime no.554/2020 of pattanakkadu police station, alappuzha petitioners/accused 1 and 2: 1 emmanuel antony aged 47 years s/o. antony, thottukadavil, kadakkarappally, p/w2, 2 antony aged 82 years s/o. lonan, thottukadavil, kadakkarappally, p/w2, by advs. sri.c.a.chacko smt.c.m.charisma respondent/s:1 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam-682 031. 2 the station house officer pattanakkadu police station, alappuzha-688 531. sri. amjad ali pp this bail application having come up for admission on 29.05.2020, the court on the same day passed the following:orderdated this the 29th day of may 2020 the petitioners are accused 1 and 2 in crime no.554/2020 of pattanakkadu police station, for having allegedly committed offences punishable under sections 447, 427, 379 r/w 34 of the ipc.2. it is now submitted by the learned publicprosecutor under instructions that, section 379 of the ipc has been deleted from the fir and report to that effect has been filed before the jurisdictional court. under the circumstances what remains are only bailable offences, and therefore, the application for the anticipatory bail will not lie. the petition is therefore dismissed. sd/- ashok menon judge spk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY 2020 / 8TH JYAISHTA, 1942 CRIME NO.554/2020 OF Pattanakkadu Police Station, Alappuzha PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 AND 2: 1 EMMANUEL ANTONY AGED 47 YEARS S/O. ANTONY, THOTTUKADAVIL, KADAKKARAPPALLY, P/W2, 2 ANTONY AGED 82 YEARS S/O. LONAN, THOTTUKADAVIL, KADAKKARAPPALLY, P/W2, BY ADVS. SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA RESPONDENT/S:

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031. 2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER PATTANAKKADU POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA-688 531. SRI. AMJAD ALI PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.05.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 29th day of May 2020 The petitioners are accused 1 and 2 in Crime No.554/2020 of Pattanakkadu Police Station, for having allegedly committed offences punishable under Sections 447, 427, 379 r/w 34 of the IPC.

2. It is now submitted by the learned Public

Prosecutor under instructions that, Section 379 of the IPC has been deleted from the FIR and report to that effect has been filed before the jurisdictional court. Under the circumstances what remains are only bailable offences, and therefore, the application for the Anticipatory Bail will not lie. The petition is therefore dismissed. Sd/- ASHOK MENON JUDGE SPK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial