A.Senthurpandiyan Vs The Inspector General of Registration

A.Senthurpandiyan vs The Inspector General of Registration

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Sep 22, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1763377

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1763377
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar
Decided On: Sep 22, 2025
Case Number: WP/3766/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.Senthurpandiyan

Respondent

The Inspector General of Registration

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 22.09.2025coram:the honourable mr. justice t.vinod kumar a.senthurpandiyan ... petitioner in both writ petitions vs chengalpet. respondents in both writ petitions prayer in w.p.no.3766 of 2019: writ petition is filed under article 226 of records of the 1st respondent in connection with his proceedings in no.3849/a2/2019 dated 31.01.2019 and quash the same as illegal. prayer in w.p.no.1041 of 2019: writ petition is filed under article 226 of records of the 1st respondent in connection with the order passed by him in proc.no.840/a2/2019, dated 07.01.2019 and quash the same. for petitioner in both petitions : no appearance for respondents in both petitions : mr.u.bharanidharan special government pleadercommon orderdespite the matter being listed on 18.08.2025, 08.09.2025 and 15.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner.2. even today (22.09.2025) when the matter is listed under thecaption 'for dismissal', there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, which only goes to show that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.3. in view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. no costs. consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.speaking order / non-speaking orderindex : yes / no neutral citation : yes / no msv tot. vinod kumar, j.msv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.09.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR A.Senthurpandiyan ... Petitioner in both writ petitions vs Chengalpet. Respondents in both writ petitions Prayer in W.P.No.3766 of 2019: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of records of the 1st respondent in connection with his proceedings in No.3849/A2/2019 dated 31.01.2019 and quash the same as illegal. Prayer in W.P.No.1041 of 2019: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of records of the 1st respondent in connection with the order passed by him in Proc.No.840/A2/2019, dated 07.01.2019 and quash the same. For Petitioner in both petitions : No appearance For Respondents in both petitions : Mr.U.Bharanidharan Special Government Pleader

COMMON ORDER

Despite the matter being listed on 18.08.2025, 08.09.2025 and 15.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner.

2. Even today (22.09.2025) when the matter is listed under the

caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, which only goes to show that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.

3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No msv To

T. VINOD KUMAR, J.

msv

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties A.Senthurpandiyan vs The Inspector General of Registration Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar