Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Midhun vs State of Kerala

Midhun vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 28, 2020
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1761665

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./2203/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Midhun

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....and 1781 of 2020 had granted the petitioner provisional bail for a period of thirty days from the date of order. as per condition no.5 (e), the petitioner was directed to appear before the jurisdictional court and seek regular bail on the expiry of thirty days or within three days after the withdrawal of the lock down.3. it is the case of the petitioner that as the courts are not functioning due to the national lock down and the thirty days period is to expire on 1.5.2020, the petitioner may be granted bail by this court.4. the division bench of this court has categoricallydirected the petitioner to move the jurisdictional court and seek regular bail within the aforementioned time period. the said direction cannot be modified in a subsequently filed bail application. however, taking into consideration the peculiarfacts and circumstances of the case and the adverse situationprevalent in the state due to covid-19 pandemic and the resultant national lock down and non-functioning of the courts, i enlarge the time period fixed by this court in the common order dated 1.4.2020, and direct the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional court and seek for regular bail on or before 30.5.2020. the jurisdictional court shall consider and dispose of such application, on its merits, in accordance with law, if so filed. with the above observation the bail application is disposed of. sd/- c.s.dias judge sks/28.4.2020

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S. DIAS FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2020/8TH VAISAKHA, 1942 Bail Application No. 2203 of 2020 (CRIME NO. 144 OF 2020 OF ALAPPUZHA POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT) AGAINST COMMON ORDER DATED 1.4.2020 IN BA NOS 1781 AND 2203 OF 2020 Petitioner/ Accused No.1: Midhun, Aged 23 years/2020, S/o Pradeep, Njaliparambil, Mekkadamp P.O,Valakam Panchayath, Ward -6, Muvattupuzha,Ernakulam. By Adv. Anitha Mathai Muthirenthy Respondent : State of Kerala, SHO, Alappuzha South Police Station. Through the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala By Public Prosecutor Sri.Ajith Murali THIS B.A. HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28.04.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

This is an application filed under Sec.439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. This Court by its common order dated 1.4.2020 in

BA Nos 2203 and 1781 of 2020 had granted the petitioner provisional bail for a period of thirty days from the date of order. As per Condition No.5 (e), the petitioner was directed to appear before the jurisdictional Court and seek regular bail on the expiry of thirty days or within three days after the withdrawal of the lock down.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that as the Courts are not functioning due to the national lock down and the thirty days period is to expire on 1.5.2020, the petitioner may be granted bail by this Court.

4. The Division Bench of this Court has categorically

directed the petitioner to move the jurisdictional Court and seek regular bail within the aforementioned time period. The said direction cannot be modified in a subsequently filed bail application. However, taking into consideration the peculiar

facts and circumstances of the case and the adverse situation

prevalent in the State due to Covid-19 pandemic and the resultant national lock down and non-functioning of the Courts, I enlarge the time period fixed by this Court in the common order dated 1.4.2020, and direct the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Court and seek for regular bail on or before 30.5.2020. The jurisdictional Court shall consider and dispose of such application, on its merits, in accordance with law, if so filed. With the above observation the bail application is disposed of. Sd/- C.S.DIAS JUDGE sks/28.4.2020

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial