Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Suresh vs State Represented by, the Insepctor of Police

Suresh vs State Represented by, the Insepctor of Police

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 10, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1760317

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/3257/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suresh

Respondent

State Represented by, the Insepctor of Police

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 05.03.2025coram:the honourable mr.justice g.k.ilanthiraiyan suresh ... petitioner vs1. state represented by, the inspector of police, (crime.no.212 of 2024)2. shobana mary ... respondentsprayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 482 of cr.p.c/ 528 of the bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, to call for the records relating to the fir in crime no.212 of 2024 on the file of first respondent and quash the same. for petitioner : mr.n.arun kumar for r1 : mr.r.vinothraja government advocate (crl.side)orderthis matter is posted today before this court under the caption 'for being mentioned' at the instance of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.2. the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is some typographical error in paragraph no.5 of the order dated 10.02.2025 in crl.o.p.no.3257 of 2025. hence, he prayed for suitable directions.3. considering the submission made by the learned governmentadvocate (crl.side) appearing for the petitioner, this petition is clarified and paragraph no.5 of the order dated 10.02.2025 in crl.o.p.no.3257 of 2025 shall read as follows:-“5. in view of the above, the fir in crime no.212 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent, is hereby quashed. the terms of joint memo of compromise shall form part and parcel of this order. the petitioner and the defacto complainant shall pay a sum of rs.5,000/-, (rupees five thousand only) each as costs, to the chief justice relief fund, tamil nadu, forthwith and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the registry. ”4. registry is directed to correct the order dated 10.02.2025 in crl.o.p.no.3257 of 2025, as above and issue order copy afresh. internet:yes index:yes/nospeaking/non speaking ordermn g.k.ilanthiraiyan. j, mn to1. the inspector of police,2. the public prosecutor, high court, madras.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.03.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Suresh ... Petitioner Vs

1. State Represented By, The Inspector of Police, (Crime.No.212 of 2024)

2. Shobana Mary ... Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C/ 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.212 of 2024 on the file of first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Arun Kumar For R1 : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

This matter is posted today before this Court under the caption 'For Being Mentioned' at the instance of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is some typographical error in Paragraph No.5 of the order dated 10.02.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.3257 of 2025. Hence, he prayed for suitable directions.

3. Considering the submission made by the learned Government

Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the petitioner, this petition is clarified and Paragraph No.5 of the order dated 10.02.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.3257 of 2025 shall read as follows:-

“5. In view of the above, the FIR in Crime No.212 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent, is hereby quashed. The terms of Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part and parcel of this Order. The petitioner and the defacto complainant shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/-, (Rupees Five Thousand only) each as costs, to the Chief Justice Relief Fund, Tamil Nadu, forthwith and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. ”

4. Registry is directed to correct the order dated 10.02.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.3257 of 2025, as above and issue order copy afresh. Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non speaking order

mn G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, mn To

1. The Inspector of Police,

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial