M.Ajithkumar Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,

M.Ajithkumar vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 06, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1759821

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1759821
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan
Decided On: Feb 06, 2025
Case Number: CRL OP/2864/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M.Ajithkumar

Respondent

The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 06-02-2025coramthe honourable mr justice sunder mohan mr.m.ajithkumar petitioner(s) vs the state rep by, the inspector of police, (crime no.not known/2025) respondent(s) for petitioner(s) : mr.t.balachandran for respondent(s): mr.leonard arul joseph selvam government advocate (crl.side)orderthe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 85, 318 (2), 318(4) & 351(2) of bns in crime no. not known of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.2. today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learnedgovernment advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that petition enquiry against the petitioner is pending in page no.1 of 4 c.s.r.no.28 of 2025.3. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side) for the respondent.4. considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent policehas to issue notice under section 41(a) of cr.p.c to the petitioner and the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police and the investigating officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, register f.i.r or close the petition enquiry within a period of three weeks from today. the parties are directed to co-operate with the enquiry. it is needless to say that the respondent police shall not take any coercive steps to secure the accused till the completion of enquiry on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant.5. with the above directions, this criminal original petition is disposed of. 06-02-2025 rkp index : yes/nospeaking order/non speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no page no.2 of 4 internet: yes/no to 1.the inspector of police, 2.the public prosecutor, madras high court, chennai page no.3 of 4sunder mohan, j.rkp 06.02.2025 page no.4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06-02-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Mr.M.Ajithkumar Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.Not Known/2025) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr.T.Balachandran For Respondent(s): Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 85, 318 (2), 318(4) & 351(2) of BNS in Crime No. Not known of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned

Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that petition enquiry against the petitioner is pending in Page No.1 of 4 C.S.R.No.28 of 2025.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) for the respondent.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent police

has to issue notice under Section 41(A) of Cr.P.C to the petitioner and the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police and the Investigating Officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, register F.I.R or close the petition enquiry within a period of three weeks from today. The parties are directed to co-operate with the enquiry. It is needless to say that the respondent police shall not take any coercive steps to secure the accused till the completion of enquiry on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant.

5. With the above directions, this criminal original petition is disposed of. 06-02-2025 rkp Index : Yes/No

Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No Page No.2 of 4 Internet: Yes/No To 1.The Inspector of Police, 2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai Page No.3 of 4

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

rkp 06.02.2025 Page No.4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties M.Ajithkumar vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan