B.Lalitha, vs the Commissioner,

B.Lalitha, vs The Commissioner,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Sep 03, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1758643

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1758643
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani
Decided On: Sep 03, 2025
Case Number: WP/2624/2011

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

B.Lalitha,

Respondent

The Commissioner,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 03.09.2025coram :the honourable mr. justice m. dhandapani 1.b.lalitha 2.n.rose gramani 3.n.nammalwar 4.v.sudhakar 5.r.jayachandran 6.syed ahamed hussain ... petitioners vs. 3.arulmighu ekambareswarar thirukoil, rep. by its executive officer, having its office at the temple premises, aminjikarai, chennai - 600 029. ... respondents prayer : writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india page no.1 of 4 for issuance of a writ of certiorari, calling for the records in the proceedings of the first respondent in order bearing reference mu.mu.50969/09/t3 dated 06.10.2009 and quash the same. for petitioners : mr.m.vijayan for m/s.a.jenasenan for respondents : mr.s.ravichandran additional government pleader [r1 & r2] mr.d.r.sivakumar [r3] *****orderwhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition. an endorsement to the said effect is also made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the petition today.2. recording the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. index : yes / nospeaking order / non-speaking orderneutral citation case : yes / no sp to page no.2 of 4 page no.3 of 4m.dhandapani, j.sp page no.4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.09.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI 1.B.Lalitha 2.N.Rose Gramani 3.N.Nammalwar 4.V.Sudhakar 5.R.Jayachandran 6.Syed Ahamed Hussain ... Petitioners Vs. 3.Arulmighu Ekambareswarar Thirukoil, rep. by its Executive Officer, having its office at the temple premises, Aminjikarai, Chennai - 600 029. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Page No.1 of 4 for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in the Proceedings of the first respondent in Order bearing Reference Mu.Mu.50969/09/T3 dated 06.10.2009 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Vijayan for M/s.A.Jenasenan For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravichandran Additional Government Pleader [R1 & R2] Mr.D.R.Sivakumar [R3] *****

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. An Endorsement to the said effect is also made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the Petition today.

2. Recording the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Index : Yes / No

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation Case : Yes / No sp To Page No.2 of 4 Page No.3 of 4

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

sp Page No.4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties B.Lalitha, vs The Commissioner, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani