Mr. Umesh J vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Sep 01, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1756927

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1756927
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: R. Nataraj
Decided On: Sep 01, 2025
Case Number: WP/52174/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr. Umesh J

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 1st day of september, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice r. nataraj writ petition no. 52174 of 2016 (gm-kla) between: mr. umesh j., s/o narayana poojary aged about 44 years ex-president presently member moodushedde grama panchayath mangalore taluk mangalore-575028 d.k. district …petitioner (by sri. sunil k.n., advocate for sri. t. mohandas shetty, advocate) and:1. state of karnataka rep: by its secretary digitallysigned by panchayath and rural development suma multistoried building location: dr. ambedkar veedhi,high court of bengaluru-560001. karnataka2. upa-lokayuktha3. addl. registrar (enquiry-7) …respondents -2-(by sri. srinivasa kumar m., high court government pleader for respondent no.1; vide order dated 03.10.2016, notice to respondent nos.2 and 3 is dispensed with) this wp is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to quash the order passed by the 1st respondent dated 14.09.2016 vide no.graap/88/grapk/2016 (no.uÁæc¥À/88/uÁæ¥ÀapÁ/2016) vide annexure-f and etc. this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing in 'b' group, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice r. natarajoral orderlearned proxy counsel, sri sunil k.n., appearing for sri t. mohandas shetty, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.2. his submission is noted.3. the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. sd/- (r. nataraj) judge sma/list no.: 1 sl no.: 37

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 52174 OF 2016 (GM-KLA) BETWEEN: MR. UMESH J., S/O NARAYANA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS EX-PRESIDENT PRESENTLY MEMBER MOODUSHEDDE GRAMA PANCHAYATH MANGALORE TALUK MANGALORE-575028 D.K. DISTRICT …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL K.N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. T. MOHANDAS SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP: BY ITS SECRETARY Digitally
signed by         PANCHAYATH AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
SUMA              MULTISTORIED BUILDING
Location:         DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
HIGH COURT OF BENGALURU-560001. KARNATAKA
2. UPA-LOKAYUKTHA
3. ADDL. REGISTRAR (ENQUIRY-7) …RESPONDENTS -2-
(BY SRI. SRINIVASA KUMAR M., HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; VIDE ORDER DATED 03.10.2016, NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 14.09.2016 VIDE NO.GRAAP/88/GRAPK/2016 (NO.UÁæC¥À/88/UÁæ¥ÀAPÁ/2016) VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

ORAL ORDER

Learned proxy counsel, Sri Sunil K.N., appearing for Sri T. Mohandas Shetty, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.

2. His submission is noted.

3. The petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE SMA/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Mr. Umesh J vs State of Karnataka Same Judge R. Nataraj