Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lovely vs the State of Kerala

Lovely vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 08, 2020
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1756113

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/4838/2017

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lovely

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....der l earned magi str ate dr opped t ngs i n c. 2724 of2014. accor ding t othe pet iti ,in t ermsofannexur der thasquashedonl ythe final r t as agai nst accused nos. 2 and 3 and t ngs,i ances,shoul d have been cont inued as agai staccused,t he second r . the pet iti ,ther efor e seeks appr opr iat e di ionsi nthi sregar d. 2.hear dthel earnedcounself ort hepet iti . 3.i tisseenf rom annexur dert hati oft he sai d or der thasquashed t ngs onl yasagai nstaccused nos. 2 and 3. thatf acthasbeen cl ari fied by t tin annexur e-i ii or der . i n t he ci ances,asr ight lycont ended byt iti pr nst itut ed asagai hefir staccused namel y t hesecond r espondentshoul d havebeen cont inued byt he tbel ow. i ances,t he cr c.i s al lowed, annexur e-i i or der i s quashed and t t bel ow i s di ocont inuet n c. 2724/ asagai hesecondr . sd/ - p.b.suresh kumar judge ajm appendix petitioner's exhibits:annexure a1 a true copy of the final order passed in crl.miscellaneous case in crime no hon'ble court annexure a2 a true copy of the order passed in cc no 2724/2014 on the file of the jfcm-3, thrissur dated 28.2.2017 annexure a3 a true copy of the order passed in crl.ma no 3227/2017 in crl.m.c 602/2016 dated 4.4.2017 by this hon'ble court. respondents' exhibits: nil ajm //true copy// pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 18TH POUSHA, 1941 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 2724/2014 DATED 28-02-2017 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -III,THRISSUR CRIME NO.602/2016 OF Ollur Police Station , Thrissur PETITIONER:

LOVELY AGED 32, D/O.SUNNY, CHIRAMMEL HOUSE, ST.THOMAS STREET, KURIACHIRA, OLLUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR- 680 306 BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENTS: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OLLUR POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM- 682 031 2 GLADSTON AGED 36, S/O.JOHNSON, KUTTIKADAN HOUSE, L/23, 1ST STAGE KUVEMBU NAGAR, MYSOOR CORPORATION, KARNATAKA STATE- 570 001 R1-2 BY ADV. SRI.M.J.POLLY THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Cr ime. No. 750/ 2014 ofOl lur Pol ice St ati on was r egi ster ed at t nst ance oft iti oner agai nst her husband,t he second r espondent and hi s par ent s under Sect ion 498A and 406 r ead wi th Sect ion 34 oft ndi an Penal Code. Af ter due i nvest igat ion, t he pol ice char gesheet he accused f or t he of fences puni shabl e undert he af oresai d Sect ionsand t he mat terwaspendi ng bef toft he J udi cialMagi str ate oft he Fi rst Cl assI II,Thr issur ,asC. 2724 of2014. The second r espondent was t st accused i nthe case and hi s par ent swer e accused Nos. 2 and 3 i nthe case. Accused Nos. 2 and 3 chal lenged t tas agai hem bef t i n Cr 602 of2016,and t his tquashedt tint ofAnnexur e-1 or der . Pur suantt o Annexur e 1 or der l earned Magi str ate dr opped t ngs i n C. 2724 of2014. Accor ding t othe pet iti ,in t ermsofAnnexur der thasquashedonl ythe final r t as agai nst accused Nos. 2 and 3 and t ngs,i ances,shoul d have been cont inued as agai staccused,t he second r . The pet iti ,ther efor e seeks appr opr iat e di ionsi nthi sregar d. 2.Hear dthel earnedcounself ort hepet iti . 3.I tisseenf rom Annexur dert hati oft he sai d or der thasquashed t ngs onl yasagai nstaccused Nos. 2 and 3. Thatf acthasbeen cl ari fied by t tin Annexur e-I II or der . I n t he ci ances,asr ight lycont ended byt iti pr nst itut ed asagai hefir staccused namel y t hesecond r espondentshoul d havebeen cont inued byt he tbel ow. I ances,t he Cr C.i s al lowed, Annexur e-I I or der i s quashed and t t bel ow i s di ocont inuet n C. 2724/ asagai hesecondr . Sd/ - P.B.SURESH KUMAR JUDGE AJM APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE A1 A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL ORDER PASSED IN CRL.MISCELLANEOUS CASE IN CRIME NO HON'BLE COURT ANNEXURE A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED IN CC NO 2724/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE JFCM-3, THRISSUR DATED 28.2.2017 ANNEXURE A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED IN CRL.MA NO 3227/2017 IN CRL.M.C 602/2016 DATED 4.4.2017 BY THIS HON'BLE COURT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL AJM //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial